Palmisano J M, Akingbola O A, Moler F W, Custer J R
CS Mott Children's Hospital, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
Respir Care. 1994 Jul;39(7):725-9.
Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) training programs exist to enhance knowledge and skills retention. However, they do not ensure that effective CPR will be performed by trainees or resuscitation teams. One aspect of CPR effectiveness is the ability of the team to respond to an emergency call in a timely manner.
We prospectively evaluated the time required for team members to respond to an emergency call and to initiate definitive treatment in our pediatric facility. The medical staff who responded had no prior knowledge of the simulated cardiac arrest (SCA) events. All events were recorded on audio-cassette tape to determine the sequence of events and response time of arrest team members. SCA scenarios represented examples of cardiac, hematologic, renal, respiratory, and pharmacologic pathophysiology. All participants were instructed to respond as though the SCA were an actual emergency.
From December 1991 to January 1993, 37 SCAs were evaluated. Documentation began after a concise arrest scenario had been presented to a designated nursing representative who was to be the first rescuer on the scene. The rescuer first assessed the patient's condition, activated the cardiac arrest system (median elapsed time, MET, 0.50 minutes), and then initiated single-person CPR (MET 0.58 minutes). Administration of oxygen occurred at an MET of 2.25 minutes. The first member of the arrest team to respond was the pediatric resident (MET 3.17 minutes) followed by the respiratory therapist (MET 3.20 minutes), an ICU nurse (MET 3.58 minutes), a pharmacist (MET 3.42 minutes), and anesthesiology personnel (MET 4.70 minutes).
The use of SCAs (termed "Mega Code") serves as an extension of Basic Life Support and Advanced Cardiac Life Support education and provides a valuable learning experience and quality assurance tool. Limitations that might influence patient outcome during an actual in-hospital arrest have led to refinements in our cardiac arrest procedures. Of particular note was the delay in oxygen administration, which may be linked to its omission from the 1986 and 1992 American Heart Association Basic Life Support Guidelines.
We believe that BLS education for hospital employees should include and emphasize oxygen delivery for resuscitation.
心肺复苏(CPR)培训项目旨在增强知识和技能的留存。然而,它们并不能确保学员或复苏团队会实施有效的心肺复苏。心肺复苏有效性的一个方面是团队及时响应紧急呼叫的能力。
我们前瞻性地评估了团队成员在我们的儿科机构中响应紧急呼叫并开始确定性治疗所需的时间。做出响应的医务人员事先对模拟心脏骤停(SCA)事件不知情。所有事件都记录在盒式录音带上,以确定事件的顺序和骤停团队成员的响应时间。SCA场景代表了心脏、血液、肾脏、呼吸和药理病理生理学的实例。所有参与者都被指示要像SCA是实际紧急情况一样做出响应。
从1991年12月到1993年1月,对37次SCA进行了评估。在向指定的护理代表(将是现场的第一救援者)呈现简洁的骤停场景后开始记录。救援者首先评估患者状况,启动心脏骤停系统(中位经过时间,MET,0.50分钟),然后开始单人CPR(MET 0.58分钟)。在MET为2.25分钟时给予氧气。响应的骤停团队的第一名成员是儿科住院医师(MET 3.17分钟),其次是呼吸治疗师(MET 3.20分钟)、一名重症监护病房护士(MET 3.58分钟)、一名药剂师(MET 3.42分钟)和麻醉人员(MET 4.70分钟)。
使用SCA(称为“大型模拟急救演练”)作为基础生命支持和高级心脏生命支持教育的延伸,并提供了宝贵的学习经验和质量保证工具。在实际医院内骤停期间可能影响患者结局的局限性导致了我们心脏骤停程序的改进。特别值得注意的是氧气给予的延迟,这可能与它在1986年和1992年美国心脏协会基础生命支持指南中的遗漏有关。
我们认为,对医院员工的基础生命支持教育应包括并强调复苏时的氧气输送。