Smith M H, Anderson R T, Bradham D D, Longino C F
Department of Public Health Sciences, Bowman Gray School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC 27157, USA.
J Rural Health. 1995 Fall;11(4):274-85. doi: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1995.tb00425.x.
Previous research on rural and urban differences in risk of mortality has been inconclusive. This article used data from the National Longitudinal Mortality Study to establish whether all-cause mortality risk among persons 55 years and older varies by degree of urbanization, controlling for the potential sociodemographic confounders of age, gender, race/ethnicity, education, income, and marital status. Using the Cox Proportional Hazards Regression Procedure, the authors found that persons living in the most rural locales and those living in rural communities in standard metropolitan statistical areas (SMSAs) have the lowest risk of mortality, while those living in SMSA central cities had the highest risk of dying during the study period. The protective effect of rural residence declines in older age cohorts.
先前关于城乡死亡率风险差异的研究尚无定论。本文利用全国纵向死亡率研究的数据,在控制年龄、性别、种族/族裔、教育程度、收入和婚姻状况等潜在社会人口混杂因素的情况下,确定55岁及以上人群的全因死亡风险是否因城市化程度而异。通过Cox比例风险回归程序,作者发现居住在最偏远农村地区的人和居住在标准大都市统计区(SMSA)农村社区的人死亡率风险最低,而居住在SMSA中心城市的人在研究期间死亡风险最高。农村居住的保护作用在老年人群体中有所下降。