• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

全髋关节置换手术中评估结果的措施比较。

Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.

作者信息

Dawson J, Fitzpatrick R, Murray D, Carr A

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Primary Care, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):81-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.81.

DOI:10.1136/qshc.5.2.81
PMID:10158596
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1055370/
Abstract

OBJECTIVES

To compare the performance of a disease specific and a general health questionnaire in assessing changes resulting from total hip replacement.

DESIGN

Two stage prospective study of patients undergoing total hip replacement surgery involving an assessment at a clinic before and six months after surgery. 60(32%) patients were followed up by post.

SETTING

Outpatient departments at a specialist orthopaedic hospital and peripheral clinics within Oxfordshire.

PATIENTS

188 patients admitted for unilateral total hip replacement between February and mid-August 1994.

MAIN MEASURES

Patients' self assessed scores with the 12 item Oxford hip score and SF-36 general health questionnaire together with surgeons' assessment with Charnley hip score obtained before and again at six months after surgery.

RESULTS

186 patients were followed up six months after total hip replacement; a subsample (n=60) by post. Of the 60 postal patients, 59(98.3%) fully completed the Oxford hip score compared with 44(73.3%) who fully completed the SF-36. For the followup sample as a whole, post operative changes in scores produced a large effect size of 2.75 on the Oxford hip score, compared with -1.89 physical function (SF-36), -2.13 pain (SF-36). With the exception of physical function and role (physical), postoperative SF-36 scores were shown to be similar to or better than those found by two population surveys on patients of comparable age. The responsiveness of a disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and relevant sections of a general questionnaire, SF-36, were found to be similar as assessed by three different criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

A disease specific questionnaire, the Oxford hip score, and a general state of health questionnaire, SF-36, performed similarly in assessing outcomes of total hip replacement except that the disease specific questionnaire resulted in a higher completion rate and greater responsiveness in some sections. On the other hand the general health questionnaire drew attention to broader problems of physical function not considered by the Oxford hip score. The health questionnaires examined here offer a valid and practical means of monitoring outcomes of hip replacement surgery.

摘要

目的

比较一种疾病特异性问卷和一种一般健康问卷在评估全髋关节置换术后变化方面的表现。

设计

对接受全髋关节置换手术患者的两阶段前瞻性研究,包括术前在诊所及术后六个月的评估。60名(32%)患者通过邮寄方式进行随访。

地点

一家专业骨科医院的门诊部及牛津郡内的周边诊所。

患者

1994年2月至8月中旬期间收治的188名单侧全髋关节置换患者。

主要测量指标

患者使用12项牛津髋关节评分和SF-36一般健康问卷进行自我评估得分,以及外科医生在术前和术后六个月使用查恩利髋关节评分进行评估。

结果

186名患者在全髋关节置换术后六个月接受随访;60名患者通过邮寄方式进行随访。在这60名通过邮寄方式随访的患者中,59名(98.3%)完全完成了牛津髋关节评分,而完全完成SF-36问卷的有44名(73.3%)。对于整个随访样本,术后评分变化在牛津髋关节评分上产生了2.75的大效应量,相比之下,在身体功能(SF-36)上为-1.89,在疼痛(SF-36)上为-2.13。除身体功能和角色(身体方面)外,术后SF-36评分显示与两项针对可比年龄患者的人群调查结果相似或更好。通过三种不同标准评估发现,疾病特异性问卷牛津髋关节评分和一般问卷SF-36的相关部分的反应性相似。

结论

疾病特异性问卷牛津髋关节评分和一般健康问卷SF-36在评估全髋关节置换结果方面表现相似,只是疾病特异性问卷的完成率更高,且在某些部分反应性更强。另一方面,一般健康问卷关注到了牛津髋关节评分未考虑的更广泛的身体功能问题。此处研究的健康问卷为监测髋关节置换手术结果提供了一种有效且实用的方法。

相似文献

1
Comparison of measures to assess outcomes in total hip replacement surgery.全髋关节置换手术中评估结果的措施比较。
Qual Health Care. 1996 Jun;5(2):81-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.5.2.81.
2
The problem of 'noise' in monitoring patient-based outcomes: generic, disease-specific and site-specific instruments for total hip replacement.监测基于患者的结局中的“噪声”问题:全髋关节置换的通用、疾病特异性和部位特异性工具。
J Health Serv Res Policy. 1996 Oct;1(4):224-31. doi: 10.1177/135581969600100408.
3
The value of short and simple measures to assess outcomes for patients of total hip replacement surgery.用于评估全髋关节置换手术患者预后的简短简易测量方法的价值。
Qual Health Care. 2000 Sep;9(3):146-50. doi: 10.1136/qhc.9.3.146.
4
Patient-reported outcome in total hip replacement. A comparison of five instruments of health status.全髋关节置换术中患者报告的结局。五种健康状况评估工具的比较。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004 Aug;86(6):801-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.86b6.14950.
5
Outcome measures for orthopaedic interventions on the hip.髋关节骨科干预的疗效指标。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2008 May;90(5):545-9. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.90B5.19746.
6
Oxford knee score and SF-36: translation & reliability for use with total knee arthroscopy patients in Thailand.牛津膝关节评分与SF-36:用于泰国全膝关节置换患者的翻译及可靠性研究
J Med Assoc Thai. 2005 Sep;88(9):1194-202.
7
Outcomes after hip or knee replacement surgery for osteoarthritis. A prospective cohort study comparing patients' quality of life before and after surgery with age-related population norms.骨关节炎患者髋或膝关节置换手术后的结局。一项前瞻性队列研究,将患者手术前后的生活质量与年龄相关的人群标准进行比较。
Med J Aust. 1999 Sep 6;171(5):235-8.
8
Health related quality of life in patients with total hip or knee replacement.全髋关节或膝关节置换患者的健康相关生活质量
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999 May;80(5):572-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(99)90202-2.
9
Validity and responsiveness of the Oxford hip score in a prospective study with Japanese total hip arthroplasty patients.一项针对日本全髋关节置换术患者的前瞻性研究中牛津髋关节评分的有效性和反应性。
J Orthop Sci. 2009 Jan;14(1):35-9. doi: 10.1007/s00776-008-1292-9. Epub 2009 Feb 13.
10
Results of total joint arthroplasty and joint preserving surgery in younger patients evaluated by alternative outcome measures.采用替代结局指标评估年轻患者全关节置换术和保关节手术的结果。
Dan Med J. 2014 Apr;61(4):B4836.

引用本文的文献

1
HIP Surgical Techniques to Enhance Rehabilitation (HIPSTER) : a single-centre, double-blind, parallel three-arm, randomized-controlled, superiority trial.髋关节手术技术促进康复(HIPSTER):一项单中心、双盲、平行三臂、随机对照优效性试验。
Bone Jt Open. 2025 Aug 27;6(8):991-1005. doi: 10.1302/2633-1462.68.BJO-2025-0065.
2
Postoperative longer leg on surgical side and high riding greater trochanter worsen forgotten joint score after unilateral total hip arthroplasty.单侧全髋关节置换术后,手术侧下肢术后变长及大转子高位会使关节遗忘评分恶化。
Sci Rep. 2025 Mar 19;15(1):9530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-93547-8.
3
Low-grade systemic inflammation, but not neuroinflammation, is associated with 12-month postoperative outcome after total hip arthroplasty in patients with painful osteoarthritis.低度全身炎症而非神经炎症与疼痛性骨关节炎患者全髋关节置换术后12个月的预后相关。
Bone Joint Res. 2024 Dec 6;13(12):741-749. doi: 10.1302/2046-3758.1312.BJR-2024-0103.R1.
4
Longitudinal Analysis and Latent Growth Modeling of the Modified Hip Dysfunction and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS-JR).关节置换改良髋关节功能障碍与骨关节炎疗效评分(HOOS-JR)的纵向分析与潜在增长模型
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 May 15;12(10):1024. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12101024.
5
Comparative analysis of the quality of life regarding patients who underwent hip replacement in public versus private hospitals in Hungary.比较分析在匈牙利公立医院和私立医院接受髋关节置换手术的患者的生活质量。
Sci Rep. 2024 May 1;14(1):10031. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-60720-4.
6
Effects of Electromyographic Biofeedback-Assisted Exercise on Functional Recovery and Quality of Life in Patients after Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial.肌电图生物反馈辅助运动对全髋关节置换术后患者功能恢复及生活质量的影响:一项随机对照试验
J Pers Med. 2023 Dec 15;13(12):1716. doi: 10.3390/jpm13121716.
7
The Danish Pain Research Biobank (DANPAIN-Biobank): a collection of blood, cerebrospinal fluid, and clinical data for the study of neuroimmune and glia-related biomarkers of chronic pain.丹麦疼痛研究生物样本库(DANPAIN-Biobank):一个用于研究慢性疼痛的神经免疫和胶质细胞相关生物标志物的血液、脑脊液及临床数据集合。
Ann Transl Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(10):343. doi: 10.21037/atm-22-5319. Epub 2023 Jul 17.
8
Including patient-reported measures in performance evaluation systems: Patient contribution in assessing and improving the healthcare systems.将患者报告的测量结果纳入绩效评估系统中:患者在评估和改善医疗保健系统方面的贡献。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2022 Dec;37 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):144-165. doi: 10.1002/hpm.3596. Epub 2022 Dec 17.
9
Measurement properties of the HOOS-PS in revision total hip arthroplasty: a validation study on validity, interpretability, and responsiveness in 136 revision hip arthroplasty patients.HOOS-PS 在翻修全髋关节置换术中的测量性能:136 例翻修髋关节置换术患者的有效性、可解释性和反应性验证研究。
Acta Orthop. 2022 Sep 19;93:742-749. doi: 10.2340/17453674.2022.4572.
10
Surgical Approaches for Managing Femoral Head Fractures (FHFs); What and How to Choose from the Different Options?治疗股骨头骨折(FHFs)的手术方法;如何从不同选项中进行选择以及选择什么?
Orthop Res Rev. 2022 Apr 23;14:133-145. doi: 10.2147/ORR.S353582. eCollection 2022.

本文引用的文献

1
SF 36 health survey questionnaire: II. Responsiveness to changes in health status in four common clinical conditions.SF-36健康调查问卷:II. 四种常见临床病症中对健康状况变化的反应性。
Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;3(4):186-92. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.4.186.
2
SF 36 health survey questionnaire: I. Reliability in two patient based studies.SF-36健康调查问卷:一、两项基于患者的研究中的信度
Qual Health Care. 1994 Dec;3(4):180-5. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.4.180.
3
Total hip replacement.全髋关节置换术
Qual Health Care. 1994 Jun;3(2):114-9. doi: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.114.
4
Importance of sensitivity to change as a criterion for selecting health status measures.将对变化的敏感性作为选择健康状况衡量指标的标准的重要性。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Jun;1(2):89-93. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.2.89.
5
Evidence for validity of a health status measure in assessing short term outcomes of cholecystectomy.一项健康状况测量指标在评估胆囊切除短期预后中的有效性证据。
Qual Health Care. 1992 Mar;1(1):10-4. doi: 10.1136/qshc.1.1.10.
6
Health status, outcome, and attributability: is a red rose red in the dark?健康状况、结果及可归因性:红玫瑰在黑暗中还是红色的吗?
Qual Health Care. 1993 Dec;2(4):259-62. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2.4.259.
7
Questionnaire on the perceptions of patients about total hip replacement.关于患者对全髋关节置换术认知的调查问卷。
J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1996 Mar;78(2):185-90.
8
Using patient reports to assess health-related quality of life after total hip replacement.利用患者报告评估全髋关节置换术后与健康相关的生活质量。
Qual Life Res. 1993 Feb;2(1):3-11. doi: 10.1007/BF00642884.
9
Designer hips.定制髋关节
BMJ. 1993 Mar 20;306(6880):732-3. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6880.732.
10
A comparison of the sensitivity to change of several health status instruments in rheumatoid arthritis.类风湿关节炎中几种健康状况评估工具对变化的敏感性比较。
J Rheumatol. 1993 Mar;20(3):429-36.