Currie Christine S M, Floyd Katherine, Williams Brian G, Dye Christopher
School of Mathematics, University of Southampton, Southampton, SO17 1BJ, UK.
BMC Public Health. 2005 Dec 12;5:130. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-5-130.
The HIV epidemic has caused a dramatic increase in tuberculosis (TB) in East and southern Africa. Several strategies have the potential to reduce the burden of TB in high HIV prevalence settings, and cost and cost-effectiveness analyses can help to prioritize them when budget constraints exist. However, published cost and cost-effectiveness studies are limited.
Our objective was to compare the cost, affordability and cost-effectiveness of seven strategies for reducing the burden of TB in countries with high HIV prevalence. A compartmental difference equation model of TB and HIV and recent cost data were used to assess the costs (year 2003 USD prices) and effects (TB cases averted, deaths averted, DALYs gained) of these strategies in Kenya during the period 2004-2023.
The three lowest cost and most cost-effective strategies were improving TB cure rates, improving TB case detection rates, and improving both together. The incremental cost of combined improvements to case detection and cure was below USD 15 million per year (7.5% of year 2000 government health expenditure); the mean cost per DALY gained of these three strategies ranged from USD 18 to USD 34. Antiretroviral therapy (ART) had the highest incremental costs, which by 2007 could be as large as total government health expenditures in year 2000. ART could also gain more DALYs than the other strategies, at a cost per DALY gained of around USD 260 to USD 530. Both the costs and effects of treatment for latent tuberculosis infection (TLTI) for HIV+ individuals were low; the cost per DALY gained ranged from about USD 85 to USD 370. Averting one HIV infection for less than USD 250 would be as cost-effective as improving TB case detection and cure rates to WHO target levels.
To reduce the burden of TB in high HIV prevalence settings, the immediate goal should be to increase TB case detection rates and, to the extent possible, improve TB cure rates, preferably in combination. Realising the full potential of ART will require substantial new funding and strengthening of health system capacity so that increased funding can be used effectively.
在东非和南部非洲,艾滋病疫情导致结核病(TB)大幅增加。有几种策略有可能减轻艾滋病毒高流行地区的结核病负担,而成本和成本效益分析有助于在存在预算限制的情况下对这些策略进行优先排序。然而,已发表的成本和成本效益研究有限。
我们的目标是比较七种减轻艾滋病毒高流行国家结核病负担策略的成本、可承受性和成本效益。利用结核病和艾滋病毒的隔室差分方程模型以及最新成本数据,评估这些策略在2004 - 2023年期间在肯尼亚的成本(2003年美元价格)和效果(避免的结核病例数、避免的死亡数、获得的伤残调整生命年数)。
成本最低且最具成本效益的三种策略是提高结核病治愈率、提高结核病病例发现率以及同时提高这两者。病例发现和治愈综合改善的增量成本每年低于1500万美元(占2000年政府卫生支出的7.5%);这三种策略每获得一个伤残调整生命年的平均成本在18美元至34美元之间。抗逆转录病毒疗法(ART)的增量成本最高,到2007年可能高达2000年政府卫生支出总额。与其他策略相比,抗逆转录病毒疗法也能获得更多的伤残调整生命年,每获得一个伤残调整生命年的成本约为260美元至530美元。对艾滋病毒阳性个体进行潜伏性结核感染治疗(TLTI)的成本和效果都较低;每获得一个伤残调整生命年的成本在约85美元至370美元之间。以低于250美元的成本避免一例艾滋病毒感染与将结核病病例发现率和治愈率提高到世界卫生组织目标水平具有相同的成本效益。
为减轻艾滋病毒高流行地区的结核病负担,近期目标应是提高结核病病例发现率,并尽可能提高结核病治愈率,最好是两者结合。要充分发挥抗逆转录病毒疗法的潜力,需要大量新资金并加强卫生系统能力,以便有效利用增加的资金。