Boyle P J, Moskowitz E
Park Ridge Center, Chicago, USA.
Health Prog. 1996 Nov-Dec;77(6):48-53.
Effective resource management involves prospective decision making, including setting priorities. This enables healthcare facilities to provide services that are consistent with institutional commitments and, under some circumstances, to limit or deny services that are inconsistent with those commitments. The challenge is to apply explicit moral analysis to resource allocation efforts to ensure that facilities are treating patients consistently and fairly. Not only are allocation decisions unavoidable, they also can promote holistic, socially responsible medical practice. But current mechanisms, which are largely hidden from view and informal, can negatively affect important relationships with constituents. The just allocation of our precious healthcare resources rests on values that can either conflict with or complement one another. The core values in resource management include respect for persons, professional integrity, due process, informed consent, stewardship, and the common good. An interdisciplinary team of providers should oversee an ongoing review of resource management mechanisms. The group should meet regularly to look at how the mechanism works, what its goals are, what unit of care it evaluates, and what measurements are used to reach the goals. The measures might include severity of illness, effectiveness, cost, and social factors. Examining questions related to each of these areas can help the group determine whether an existing or proposed resource management mechanism is morally defensible.
有效的资源管理涉及前瞻性决策,包括确定优先事项。这使医疗机构能够提供符合机构承诺的服务,并且在某些情况下,限制或拒绝提供与这些承诺不一致的服务。挑战在于对资源分配工作应用明确的道德分析,以确保医疗机构公正、一致地对待患者。分配决策不仅不可避免,还能促进全面、对社会负责的医疗实践。但当前的机制大多不为人所见且不正规,可能会对与相关方的重要关系产生负面影响。我们宝贵的医疗资源的公正分配基于可能相互冲突或互补的价值观。资源管理的核心价值观包括尊重个人、职业操守、正当程序、知情同意、管理责任和共同利益。一个跨学科的医疗服务团队应监督对资源管理机制的持续审查。该团队应定期开会,审视该机制的运作方式、目标、评估的护理单位以及用于实现目标的衡量标准。这些衡量标准可能包括疾病严重程度、有效性、成本和社会因素。审视与这些领域中每一个相关的问题,有助于该团队确定现有的或提议的资源管理机制在道德上是否站得住脚。