Suppr超能文献

卫生部门改革计划中的性别与公平:一项综述

Gender and equity in health sector reform programmes: a review.

作者信息

Standing H

机构信息

Centre for Culture, Development and the Environment, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.

出版信息

Health Policy Plan. 1997 Mar;12(1):1-18. doi: 10.1093/heapol/12.1.1.

Abstract

This paper reviews current literature and debates about Health Sector Reform (HSR) in developing countries in the context of its possible implications for women's health and for gender equity. It points out that gender is a significant marker of social and economic vulnerability which is manifest in inequalities of access to health care and in women's and men's different positioning as users and producers of health care. Any analysis of equity must therefore include a consideration of gender issues. Two main approaches to thinking about gender issues in health care are distinguished--a 'women's health' approach, and a 'gender inequality' approach. The framework developed by Cassels (1995), highlighting six main components of HSR, is used to try to pinpoint the implications of HSR in relation to both of these approaches. This review makes no claim to sociological or geographical comprehensiveness. It attempts instead to provide an analysis of the gender and women's health issues most likely to be associated with each of the major elements of HSR and to outline an agenda for further research. It points out that there is a severe paucity of information on the actual impact of HSR from a gender point of view and in relation to substantive forms of vulnerability (e.g. particular categories of women, specific age groups). The use of generic categories, such as 'the poor' or 'very poor', leads to insufficient disaggregation of the impact of changes in the terms on which health care is provided. This suggests the need for more carefully focused data collection and empirical research.

摘要

本文回顾了当前关于发展中国家卫生部门改革(HSR)的文献及相关争论,探讨了其对女性健康和性别平等可能产生的影响。文中指出,性别是社会和经济脆弱性的重要标志,这体现在获得医疗保健的不平等以及男女在医疗保健使用者和提供者角色上的不同定位。因此,任何公平性分析都必须考虑性别问题。文中区分了思考医疗保健中性别问题的两种主要方法——“女性健康”方法和“性别不平等”方法。卡塞尔(1995年)提出的框架突出了卫生部门改革的六个主要组成部分,本文运用该框架试图明确卫生部门改革与这两种方法相关的影响。本综述并不追求社会学或地理学意义上的全面性。相反,它试图分析最有可能与卫生部门改革各主要要素相关的性别和女性健康问题,并概述进一步研究的议程。文中指出,从性别角度以及与实质性脆弱形式(如特定类别的女性、特定年龄组)相关的卫生部门改革实际影响方面的信息严重匮乏。使用“穷人”或“极贫者”等通用类别会导致对医疗保健提供条件变化影响的分类不够细致。这表明需要更有针对性地收集数据和开展实证研究。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验