Gijsbers van Wijk C M, van Vliet K P, Kolk A M
Department of Clinical Psychology, Faculty of Psychology, University of Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Soc Sci Med. 1996 Sep;43(5):707-20. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(96)00115-3.
Gender inequalities in health are a consequence of the basic inequality between men and women in many societies. Despite the importance of socio-economic factors, women's health is also greatly affected by the extent and quality of health services available to them. Both non-governmental women's organizations and feminist health researchers have in recent years identified major gender inequalities in access to services and in the way men and women are treated by the health care system. Firstly, although women are major health care users as well as providers, they are under-represented in decision-making in health care. Secondly, no justice is done in general to existing differences in position and needs of women and men in defining quality of health care, i.e. gender aspects. Among women's organizations, there is general agreement that "gender sensitive health care should be available, accessible, affordable, appropriate and acceptable". In addition, health care for women should be adequate and not depart from a male model of health and illness. In this paper, we pay attention to inappropriate health care for women on the one hand, as illustrated by the increasing medicalization of women's reproductive life [menstruation, menopause, pregnancy and childbirth and (in)fertility]. On the other hand, we discuss gender bias in the management of serious, life-threatening diseases such as cardiovascular disease, lung cancer, and kidney failure, as a form of inadequate care. These examples are followed by a global vision on quality of care from a gender perspective, as formulated by the women's health care movement in the Netherlands and at the Fourth International Conference on Women in Beijing. If anything, the recommendations agreed upon in Beijing will have to ensure the consolidation and enhancement of good quality health care for women around the world. The final discussion, attempts to give some general recommendations for achieving more adequate (gender sensitive) and appropriate (non-medicalizing) health care for women. These recommendations pertain to health and health care research, policy, education, and organization from a women's perspective.
健康领域的性别不平等是许多社会中男女基本不平等的结果。尽管社会经济因素很重要,但妇女的健康也受到她们所能获得的医疗服务的范围和质量的极大影响。近年来,非政府妇女组织和女权主义健康研究人员都发现,在获得服务以及医疗保健系统对待男女的方式上存在重大的性别不平等。首先,尽管妇女既是主要的医疗保健使用者也是提供者,但她们在医疗保健决策中的代表性不足。其次,在定义医疗保健质量(即性别方面)时,对于男女现有地位和需求的差异,总体上没有做到公平对待。在妇女组织中,普遍达成的共识是“应提供对性别敏感的、可获得的、负担得起的、适当的和可接受的医疗保健”。此外,妇女的医疗保健应该是充分的,并且不应偏离男性的健康与疾病模式。在本文中,一方面,我们关注对妇女不适当的医疗保健,这体现在妇女生殖生活(月经、更年期、怀孕和分娩以及生育能力)日益医学化上。另一方面,我们讨论在诸如心血管疾病、肺癌和肾衰竭等严重的、危及生命的疾病管理中的性别偏见,这是一种不充分护理的形式。这些例子之后是从荷兰妇女医疗保健运动以及在北京举行的第四次妇女问题国际会议所阐述的性别视角对护理质量的全球展望。如果说有什么作用的话,在北京达成的建议将必须确保巩固和加强全世界妇女的优质医疗保健。最后的讨论试图从妇女的角度为实现更充分(对性别敏感)和适当(非医学化)的妇女医疗保健提出一些一般性建议。这些建议涉及健康与医疗保健研究、政策、教育以及组织。