Baker R, Farooqi A, Tait C, Walsh S
Department of General Practice and Primary Health Care, University of Leicester, UK.
Qual Health Care. 1997 Mar;6(1):14-8. doi: 10.1136/qshc.6.1.14.
To determine whether reminder cards in medical records enhance the effectiveness of audit with feedback in improving the care of patients taking long term benzodiazepine drugs.
Randomised trial, practices receiving feedback only in one group and practices receiving feedback plus reminder cards in the other group.
18 general practices in Leicestershire.
Random samples of patients who had been taking a benzodiazepine anxiolytic or hypnotic drug for four weeks or longer.
Entries in medical records indicating compliance with five criteria of care: assessment of suitability for withdrawal; being told about dependency; withdrawal being recommended; withdrawal or continuing medication; and a consultation with the general practitioner in the past year. Data were collected before and after feedback or feedback plus reminders.
Of a total population of 125,846 registered with the 18 practices, 2409 (1.9%) had been taking a benzodiazepine for four weeks or longer. Of the 742 in the first samples, 543 (73.2%) were women, the mean (SD) age was 68.7 (14.9) years, and they had been taking a benzodiazepine for 10.1 (6.7) years. The number of patients whose care complied with the criteria rose after the interventions to implement change. The increase was greater in practices receiving feedback plus reminders for only two of the five criteria "told about dependency" increasing from 52 (11.1%) to 118 (25.8%) in the feedback only group, and from 27 (10.5%) to 184 (43.0%) in the feedback plus reminders group; odds ratio (OR) 1.46 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.32 to 5.21); and "consulted in the past year" increasing from 434 (93.1%) to 411 (95.8%) in the feedback only group and 255 (96.6%) to 400 (99.8%) in the feedback plus reminders group, OR (95% CI) 13.5 (2.01 to 330.3).
Reminder cards had only a limited effect and cannot be recommended for routine use. There were improvements in the care of patients of both groups of practices and further studies are indicated to determine the impact of both systematically developed criteria and reminders embedded into restructured medical records.
确定病历中的提醒卡能否增强审计与反馈在改善长期服用苯二氮䓬类药物患者护理方面的效果。
随机试验,一组实践仅接受反馈,另一组实践接受反馈加提醒卡。
莱斯特郡的18家全科诊所。
随机抽取服用苯二氮䓬类抗焦虑或催眠药物四周或更长时间的患者样本。
病历中表明符合五项护理标准的记录:评估撤药适宜性;被告知药物依赖性;被建议撤药;撤药或继续用药;以及在过去一年中与全科医生进行过会诊。在反馈或反馈加提醒前后收集数据。
在这18家诊所登记的125846名总人群中,2409人(1.9%)服用苯二氮䓬类药物四周或更长时间。在首批样本的742人中,543人(73.2%)为女性,平均(标准差)年龄为68.7(14.9)岁,他们服用苯二氮䓬类药物已达10.1(6.7)年。在实施变革的干预措施后,护理符合标准的患者人数有所增加。在仅接受反馈的组中,对于“被告知药物依赖性”这一标准,仅在接受反馈加提醒的实践中增加幅度更大,从52人(11.1%)增至118人(25.8%),而在仅接受反馈的组中从27人(10.5%)增至184人(43.0%);优势比(OR)为1.46(95%置信区间(95%CI)为1.32至5.21);对于“在过去一年中进行过会诊”这一标准,仅接受反馈的组从434人(93.1%)增至411人(95.8%),接受反馈加提醒的组从255人(96.6%)增至400人(99.8%),OR(95%CI)为13.5(2.01至330.3)。
提醒卡的效果有限,不建议常规使用。两组实践中患者的护理均有改善,需要进一步研究以确定系统制定的标准以及嵌入重组病历中的提醒的影响。