• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

公平程序:在知识经济中进行管理

Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy.

作者信息

Kim W C, Mauborgne R

机构信息

INSEAD, Fontainebleau, France.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):65-75.

PMID:10168337
Abstract

Unlike the traditional factors of production--land, labor, and capital--knowledge is a resource that can't be forced out of people. But creating and sharing knowledge is essential to fostering innovation, the key challenge of the knowledge-based economy. To create a climate in which employees volunteer their creativity and expertise, managers need to look beyond the traditional tools at their disposal. They need to build trust. The authors have studied the links between trust, idea sharing, and corporate performance for more than a decade. They have explored the question of why managers of local subsidiaries so often fail to share information with executives at headquarters. They have studied the dynamics of idea sharing in product development teams, joint ventures, supplier partnerships, and corporate transformations. They offer an explanation for why people resist change even when it would benefit them directly. In every case, the decisive factor was what the authors call fair process--fairness in the way a company makes and executes decisions. The elements of fair process are simple: Engage people's input in decisions that directly affect them. Explain why decisions are made the way they are. Make clear what will be expected of employees after the changes are made. Fair process may sound like a soft issue, but it is crucial to building trust and unlocking ideas. Without it, people are apt to withhold their full cooperation and their creativity. The results are costly: ideas that never see daylight and initiatives that are never seized.

摘要

与传统生产要素——土地、劳动力和资本不同,知识是一种无法从人们身上强行获取的资源。但创造和分享知识对于促进创新至关重要,而创新是知识经济的关键挑战。为营造一种员工自愿贡献创造力和专业知识的氛围,管理者需要超越其可用的传统工具去思考。他们需要建立信任。作者们研究信任、想法分享与公司绩效之间的联系已逾十年。他们探讨了本地子公司的管理者为何常常未能与总部高管分享信息这一问题。他们研究了产品开发团队、合资企业、供应商伙伴关系及公司转型过程中想法分享的动态情况。他们解释了为何人们即使在变革会直接使自身受益的情况下仍抵制变革。在每种情况下,决定性因素都是作者所称的公平过程——公司制定和执行决策的方式的公正性。公平过程的要素很简单:在直接影响人们的决策中征求他们的意见。解释决策为何如此制定。明确变革实施后对员工的期望。公平过程听起来可能是个软性问题,但对于建立信任和激发创意至关重要。没有它,人们往往会保留全力合作及创造力。结果代价高昂:想法永无见天之日,倡议也从未被抓住。

相似文献

1
Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy.公平程序:在知识经济中进行管理
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):65-75.
2
Beyond empowerment: building a company of citizens.
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Jan;81(1):48-53.
3
It's so hard to be fair.做到公平是如此之难。
Harv Bus Rev. 2006 Mar;84(3):122-9, 150.
4
Using instrumental leadership to manage change.运用工具性领导来管理变革。
Radiol Manage. 1999 May-Jun;21(3):44-52; quiz 53-6.
5
Unleash innovation in foreign subsidiaries.激发外国子公司的创新能力。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Mar;79(3):131-7, 166.
6
Putting your company's whole brain to work.让公司的全体智慧发挥作用。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):110-21.
7
Moon shots for management.管理的宏伟目标。
Harv Bus Rev. 2009 Feb;87(2):91-8.
8
How to invest in social capital.如何投资社会资本。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Jun;79(6):86-93, 147.
9
Who's bringing you hot ideas and how are you responding?是谁给你带来了热门想法,你又是如何回应的?
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Feb;81(2):58-64, 124.
10
Are you in with the in crowd?你是不是跟那些时髦的人混在一起?
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Jul;81(7):86-92, 118.

引用本文的文献

1
Empowering Family Physicians in Medical Staff Leadership to Foster Physician Well-Being.赋予家庭医生在医务人员领导力方面的权力以促进医生的福祉。
J Am Board Fam Med. 2025 May 12;38(1):168-171. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2024.240136R1.
2
The association between transformational leadership and teachers' creativity: professional resilience and job satisfaction as mediators.变革型领导与教师创造力之间的关联:以职业复原力和工作满意度作为中介变量
Front Psychol. 2024 Dec 30;15:1514621. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1514621. eCollection 2024.
3
Does justice matter in voice? Inclusive leadership and employee voice: the moderating role of organizational justice perception.
公平在员工发声中重要吗?包容性领导与员工发声:组织公平感的调节作用。
Front Psychol. 2023 Dec 11;14:1313922. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1313922. eCollection 2023.
4
Tools for establishing a sustainable safety culture within maternity services. A retrospective case study.在产科服务中建立可持续安全文化的工具。一项回顾性案例研究。
SAGE Open Med. 2023 Mar 31;11:20503121231164264. doi: 10.1177/20503121231164264. eCollection 2023.
5
When Science is Not Enough: A Framework Towards More Customer-Focused Drug Development.当科学还不够时:迈向更以客户为中心的药物研发框架。
Adv Ther. 2017 Jul;34(7):1572-1583. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0567-y. Epub 2017 Jun 17.
6
Organizational justice, trust, and identification and their effects on organizational commitment in hospital nursing staff.组织公正、信任与认同及其对医院护理人员组织承诺的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2015 Sep 7;15:363. doi: 10.1186/s12913-015-1016-8.
7
Using visual and narrative methods to achieve fair process in clinical care.运用视觉和叙事方法在临床护理中实现公平程序。
J Vis Exp. 2011 Feb 16(48):2342. doi: 10.3791/2342.