• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

让公司的全体智慧发挥作用。

Putting your company's whole brain to work.

作者信息

Leonard D, Straus S

机构信息

Harvard Business School, Boston, MA, USA.

出版信息

Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):110-21.

PMID:10168332
Abstract

Innovate or fall behind: the competitive imperative for virtually all businesses today is that simple. Responding to that command is difficult, however, because innovation takes place when different ideas, perceptions, and ways of processing and judging information collide. And it often requires collaboration among players who see the world differently. As a result, the conflict that should take place constructively among ideas all too often ends up taking place unproductively among people. Disputes become personal, and the creative process breaks down. The manager successful at fostering innovation figures out how to get different approaches to grate against one another in a productive process the authors call creative abrasion. The authors have worked with a number of organizations over the years and have observed many managers who know how to make creative abrasion work for them. Those managers understand that different people have different thinking styles: analytical or intuitive, conceptual or experiential, social or independent, logical or values driven. They deliberately design a full spectrum of approaches and perspectives into their organizations and understand that cognitively diverse people must respect other thinking styles. They set ground rules for working together to discipline the creative process. Above all, managers who want to encourage innovation need to examine what they do to promote or inhibit creative abrasion.

摘要

要么创新,要么落后:如今,几乎所有企业面临的竞争形势就是如此简单。然而,响应这一指令并非易事,因为创新发生在不同的想法、观念以及处理和判断信息的方式相互碰撞之时。而且创新往往需要那些看待世界方式不同的参与者之间展开协作。结果,本应在想法之间建设性地发生的冲突,却常常在人与人之间毫无成效地爆发。争论变得情绪化,创造性过程也随之瓦解。成功推动创新的管理者要弄清楚如何在一个被作者称为“创造性磨合”的富有成效的过程中,让不同的方法相互摩擦碰撞。多年来,作者与许多组织合作过,观察到许多懂得如何让创造性磨合为其所用的管理者。这些管理者明白,不同的人有不同的思维方式:分析型或直觉型、概念型或经验型、社交型或独立型、逻辑型或价值驱动型。他们有意识地在组织中设计出一系列全面的方法和观点,并明白认知方式多样的人必须尊重其他思维方式。他们为共同协作制定基本规则,以规范创造性过程。最重要的是,想要鼓励创新的管理者需要审视自身行为对创造性磨合起到了促进还是抑制作用。

相似文献

1
Putting your company's whole brain to work.让公司的全体智慧发挥作用。
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):110-21.
2
The weird rules of creativity.创造力的奇特规则。
Harv Bus Rev. 2001 Sep;79(8):94-103, 161.
3
Six Sigma: not for the faint of heart.六西格玛:并非胆小者所能驾驭。
Radiol Manage. 2003 Mar-Apr;25(2):40-53.
4
Who's bringing you hot ideas and how are you responding?是谁给你带来了热门想法,你又是如何回应的?
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Feb;81(2):58-64, 124.
5
Virtuoso teams.专家团队。
Harv Bus Rev. 2005 Jul-Aug;83(7):116-23, 193.
6
Moon shots for management.管理的宏伟目标。
Harv Bus Rev. 2009 Feb;87(2):91-8.
7
Visioneering: how to unleash creative and imaginative thinking for manufacturing vision planning.愿景规划:如何释放创造性和想象力思维以进行制造愿景规划。
Hosp Mater Manage Q. 1996 Aug;18(1):40-6.
8
Managing by commitments.以承诺进行管理。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Jun;81(6):82-91, 137.
9
The 2003 HBR list. Breakthrough ideas for tomorrow's business agenda.2003年《哈佛商业评论》榜单。明日商业议程的突破性理念。
Harv Bus Rev. 2003 Apr;81(4):92-8, 124.
10
Fair process: managing in the knowledge economy.公平程序:在知识经济中进行管理
Harv Bus Rev. 1997 Jul-Aug;75(4):65-75.

引用本文的文献

1
The multi-level paths from age diversity to organizational citizenship behaviors: could leader/team-member exchange be answers that benefit the paths?从年龄多样性到组织公民行为的多层次路径:领导/团队成员交换能否成为有益于这些路径的答案?
Front Psychol. 2025 Mar 3;16:1413940. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1413940. eCollection 2025.
2
The Influence of Leader-Follower Cognitive Style Similarity on Followers' Organizational Citizenship Behaviors.领导者-追随者认知风格相似性对追随者组织公民行为的影响
Front Psychol. 2020 Jun 9;11:1265. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01265. eCollection 2020.
3
Shared Leadership Improves Team Novelty: The Mechanism and Its Boundary Condition.
共享领导力提升团队创新性:机制及其边界条件
Front Psychol. 2016 Dec 19;7:1964. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01964. eCollection 2016.