Monroe K W, King W, Atchison J A
Children's Hospital of Alabama, Birmingham 35233, USA.
Am J Manag Care. 1997 Feb;3(2):253-8.
Triage guidelines are needed to help in the decision process of intensive care unit (ICU) versus non-ICU admission for patients with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Pediatric risk of mortality (PRISM) scores have long been used to assess mortality risk. This study assess the usefulness of the traditional PRISM score and adaptation of that score (PRISM-ED, which uses presentation data only) in predicting hospital stay in pediatric patients with DKA. PRISM and PRISM-ED were tested for correlation with length of stay and length of ICU stay. A medical record review was conducted for patients admitted to The Children's Hospital of Alabama with DKA during an 18-month period (n = 79). Two scores were calculated for each study entrant: PRISM using the worst recorded values over the first 24 hours and PRISM-ED using arrival values. Median scores, median test, and Spearman rank correlations were determined for both tests. Median PRISM scores were PRISM = 11 and PRISM-ED = 12; Median PRISM and PRISM-ED scores for patients admitted to the ICU were less than median scores among floor-admitted patients: [table: see text] Spearman rank correlations were significant for both scores versus total stay: PRISM, rs = 0.29; P = 0.009; PRISM-ED, rs = 0.60, P < 0.001. Also, correlations were significant for both scores versus ICU stay: PRISM rs = 0.22, P = 0.05; PRISM-ED, rs = 0.41, P < 0.001. Triage guidelines for ICU versus floor admission for DKA patients could have significant economic impact (mean ICU charge = $11,417; mean charge for floor admission = $4,447). PRISM scores may be an important variable to include in a multiple regression model used to predict the need for ICU monitoring.
需要制定分诊指南,以辅助糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)患者入住重症监护病房(ICU)还是非ICU病房的决策过程。儿科死亡风险(PRISM)评分长期以来一直用于评估死亡风险。本研究评估传统PRISM评分及其改良版评分(仅使用就诊时数据的PRISM-ED)在预测DKA儿科患者住院时间方面的效用。对PRISM和PRISM-ED与住院时间和ICU住院时间的相关性进行了测试。对阿拉巴马州儿童医院18个月期间收治的DKA患者(n = 79)进行了病历回顾。为每位研究参与者计算两个评分:使用最初24小时内记录的最差值计算的PRISM评分,以及使用入院时数值计算的PRISM-ED评分。确定了两种评分的中位数、中位数检验和Spearman等级相关性。PRISM评分中位数为PRISM = 11,PRISM-ED评分中位数为12;入住ICU患者的PRISM和PRISM-ED评分中位数低于入住普通病房患者的评分中位数:[表格:见正文]两种评分与总住院时间的Spearman等级相关性均显著:PRISM,rs = 0.29;P = 0.009;PRISM-ED,rs = 0.60,P < 0.001。此外,两种评分与ICU住院时间的相关性也显著:PRISM,rs = 0.22,P = 0.05;PRISM-ED,rs = 0.41,P < 0.001。DKA患者入住ICU还是普通病房的分诊指南可能会产生重大经济影响(ICU平均费用 = 11,417美元;普通病房平均费用 = 4,447美元)。PRISM评分可能是用于预测ICU监测需求的多元回归模型中一个重要的变量。