• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

生存与心室扩大(SAVE)研究的经济学分析。应用于英国。

An economic analysis of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Study. Application to the United Kingdom.

作者信息

Hummel S, Piercy J, Wright R, Davie A, Bagust A, McMurray J

机构信息

York Health Economics Consortium, University of York, England.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):182-92. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00008.

DOI:10.2165/00019053-199712020-00008
PMID:10169670
Abstract

Recent studies have shown that ACE inhibitors reduce morbidity and mortality after myocardial infarction (MI). While these trials have obvious clinical implications, the widespread introduction of a new treatment for a condition as common as MI also has clear cost implications. The results of the post-MI studies with ACE inhibitors suggest that restricted use of treatment-in high-risk patients-is likely to be most cost effective, whereas treatment of all MI survivors, many of whom are at low risk, will be least cost effective. An approach somewhere in between may maximise clinical benefit at an acceptable cost. Economic analysis may help in deciding how these drugs might be best used after MI. We have conducted a cost-effectiveness and cost-utility analysis of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) study, which reported the benefit of ACE inhibitors in intermediate-risk patients. Assuming all MI survivors require measurement of left ventricular function before selection for treatment (the approach used in the SAVE study), the incremental cost per life-year gained (LYG), over 4 years, using prophylactic captopril is approximately 10000 pounds sterling (Pounds) [1994 to 1995 values]. The cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) is similar. These incremental cost per LYG and cost per QALY ratios compare favourably with other commonly used symptomatic and prophylactic treatments, and argue for extending post-MI use of ACE inhibitors to intermediate-as well as high-risk patients.

摘要

近期研究表明,血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂可降低心肌梗死(MI)后的发病率和死亡率。虽然这些试验具有明显的临床意义,但对于像MI这样常见疾病广泛采用一种新疗法也有着明确的成本影响。MI后使用ACE抑制剂的研究结果表明,限制治疗——应用于高危患者——可能最具成本效益,而对所有MI幸存者进行治疗(其中许多人风险较低)则最不具成本效益。介于两者之间的方法可能会以可接受的成本使临床获益最大化。经济分析可能有助于决定MI后如何最佳使用这些药物。我们对生存与心室扩大(SAVE)研究进行了成本效益和成本效用分析,该研究报告了ACE抑制剂对中度风险患者的益处。假设所有MI幸存者在选择治疗前都需要测量左心室功能(SAVE研究中采用的方法),使用预防性卡托普利在4年内每获得一个生命年(LYG)的增量成本约为10000英镑(按1994年至1995年的价值计算)。每质量调整生命年(QALY)的成本与之相似。这些每LYG的增量成本和每QALY成本比率与其他常用的对症和预防性治疗相比具有优势,支持将MI后ACE抑制剂的使用范围扩大至中度风险以及高危患者。

相似文献

1
An economic analysis of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement (SAVE) Study. Application to the United Kingdom.生存与心室扩大(SAVE)研究的经济学分析。应用于英国。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1997 Aug;12(2 Pt 1):182-92. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00008.
2
An economic evaluation of valsartan for post-MI patients in the UK who are not suitable for treatment with ACE inhibitors.对英国心肌梗死后不适合用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂治疗的患者使用缬沙坦的经济学评估。
Value Health. 2009 Jun;12(4):459-65. doi: 10.1111/j.1524-4733.2008.00494.x. Epub 2009 Jan 14.
3
Cost-effectiveness of captopril therapy after myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后卡托普利治疗的成本效益
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Oct;26(4):914-9. doi: 10.1016/0735-1097(95)00284-1.
4
[Cost effectiveness of captopril after myocardial infarct; comment].[心肌梗死后卡托普利的成本效益;评论]
Med Klin (Munich). 1996 Feb 15;91(2):112-8.
5
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and heart failure. The consequences of underprescribing.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与心力衰竭。处方不足的后果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jun;15(6):535-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915060-00002.
6
Captopril. A review of its pharmacology and therapeutic efficacy after myocardial infarction and in ischaemic heart disease.卡托普利。关于其在心肌梗死后及缺血性心脏病中的药理学和治疗效果的综述。
Drugs Aging. 1995 Sep;7(3):226-53. doi: 10.2165/00002512-199507030-00007.
7
Cost-effectiveness of different ACE inhibitor treatment scenarios post-myocardial infarction.
Eur Heart J. 1997 Sep;18(9):1411-5. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.eurheartj.a015466.
8
Cost effectiveness of eplerenone in patients with heart failure after acute myocardial infarction who were taking both ACE inhibitors and beta-blockers: subanalysis of the EPHESUS.依普利酮用于急性心肌梗死后同时服用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂和β受体阻滞剂的心力衰竭患者的成本效果:EPHESUS 的亚组分析。
Am J Cardiovasc Drugs. 2010;10(1):55-63. doi: 10.2165/11319940-000000000-00000.
9
Cost-effectiveness analysis of ramipril in heart failure after myocardial infarction. Economic evaluation of the Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) study for Germany from the perspective of Statutory Health Insurance.雷米普利用于心肌梗死后心力衰竭的成本效益分析。从法定健康保险角度对德国急性心肌梗死雷米普利疗效(AIRE)研究的经济学评价。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1998 Dec;14(6):653-69. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199814060-00006.
10
Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors post-myocardial infarction.心肌梗死后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂
Cardiol Clin. 1995 Aug;13(3):379-90.

引用本文的文献

1
Cost-effectiveness of zofenopril in patients with left ventricular systolic dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction: a post hoc analysis of SMILE-4.佐芬普利对急性心肌梗死后左心室收缩功能障碍患者的成本效益:SMILE-4事后分析
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2013 Jul 8;5:317-25. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S43138. Print 2013.
2
Economic burden of heart failure in the elderly.老年人心力衰竭的经济负担。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2008;26(6):447-62. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200826060-00001.
3
The dilemma of a left ventricular assist device explantation: a decision analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Discounting of health benefits in the pharmacoeconomic analysis of drug therapies: an issue for debate?药物治疗的药物经济学分析中健康效益的贴现:一个有待辩论的问题?
Pharmacoeconomics. 1992 Aug;2(2):153-62. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199202020-00007.
2
Effects of ACE inhibitors on heart failure in The Netherlands: a pharmacoeconomic model.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1993 May;3(5):387-97. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199303050-00006.
3
Time preference, duration and health state valuations.
Health Econ. 1995 Jul-Aug;4(4):289-99. doi: 10.1002/hec.4730040405.
4
左心室辅助装置植入物的困境:一项决策分析。
Can J Cardiol. 2007 Jun;23(8):657-61. doi: 10.1016/s0828-282x(07)70228-3.
4
Cost effectiveness and cost utility model of public place defibrillators in improving survival after prehospital cardiopulmonary arrest.公共场所除颤器在提高院外心脏骤停后生存率方面的成本效益和成本效用模型。
BMJ. 2003 Dec 6;327(7427):1316. doi: 10.1136/bmj.327.7427.1316.
5
Specialist nurse management programmes: economic benefits in the management of heart failure.专科护士管理项目:心力衰竭管理中的经济效益
Pharmacoeconomics. 2003;21(4):225-40. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200321040-00001.
6
Pharmacoeconomic considerations in assessing and selecting congestive heart failure therapies.评估和选择充血性心力衰竭治疗方法时的药物经济学考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 2002;20(14):963-77. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200220140-00002.
7
Prevention of coronary heart disease through treatment of infection with Chlamydia pneumoniae? Estimation of possible effectiveness and costs.通过治疗肺炎衣原体感染预防冠心病?对可能的有效性和成本的估计。
Health Care Manag Sci. 2001 Dec;4(4):269-79. doi: 10.1023/a:1011838211092.
8
ACE inhibitors after myocardial infarction. Clinical and economic considerations.心肌梗死后使用血管紧张素转换酶抑制剂。临床及经济考量
Pharmacoeconomics. 2000 Mar;17(3):237-43. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200017030-00002.
9
Costs associated with symptomatic systolic heart failure.与症状性收缩性心力衰竭相关的费用。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Oct;16(4):399-407. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199916040-00007.
10
Angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and heart failure. The consequences of underprescribing.血管紧张素转换酶(ACE)抑制剂与心力衰竭。处方不足的后果。
Pharmacoeconomics. 1999 Jun;15(6):535-50. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199915060-00002.
Some guidelines on the use of cost effectiveness league tables.关于成本效益排行榜使用的一些指南。
BMJ. 1993 Feb 27;306(6877):570-2. doi: 10.1136/bmj.306.6877.570.
5
Implications for present and future applications of the implantable cardioverter-defibrillator resulting from the use of a simple model of cost efficacy.使用简单成本效益模型对植入式心脏复律除颤器当前及未来应用的启示。
Br Heart J. 1993 Jan;69(1):83-92. doi: 10.1136/hrt.69.1.83.
6
Cost-utility analysis.成本效用分析
BMJ. 1993 Oct 2;307(6908):859-62. doi: 10.1136/bmj.307.6908.859.
7
Costs and effectiveness of angiotensin converting enzyme inhibition in patients with congestive heart failure.
Arch Intern Med. 1994 May 23;154(10):1143-9.
8
Effect of ramipril on mortality and morbidity of survivors of acute myocardial infarction with clinical evidence of heart failure. The Acute Infarction Ramipril Efficacy (AIRE) Study Investigators.雷米普利对伴有心力衰竭临床证据的急性心肌梗死幸存者死亡率和发病率的影响。急性梗死雷米普利疗效(AIRE)研究调查组。
Lancet. 1993 Oct 2;342(8875):821-8.
9
Health service costs of coronary angioplasty and coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trial.冠状动脉血管成形术和冠状动脉搭桥手术的医疗服务成本:心绞痛随机干预治疗(RITA)试验
Lancet. 1994 Oct 1;344(8927):927-30. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(94)92274-8.
10
Effects of captopril on ischemic events after myocardial infarction. Results of the Survival and Ventricular Enlargement trial. SAVE Investigators.
Circulation. 1994 Oct;90(4):1731-8. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.90.4.1731.