Perry C P, Perez J
AMI Brookwood Women's Medical Center, Birmingham, Alabama.
J Gynecol Surg. 1993 Fall;9(3):165-8. doi: 10.1089/gyn.1993.9.165.
This study was carried out to determine the efficacy of laparoscopic presacral neurectomy (LPSN) and to define its role in modern gynecology using a prospective consecutive cohort. One hundred three patients underwent LPSN, and 87 were included in this study. After LPSN, 91% of these 87 patients experienced some decrease in pelvic pain, and a majority of patients had 50% or greater reduction in pain score. There was a highly significant difference among the preoperative and postoperative pain levels (p less than 0.0001). Patients with pain of endometriosis (72), primary dysmenorrhea (5), and chronic pelvic inflammatory disease (10) responded with a decrease in pain score to this procedure. Complications included 1 patient with intraoperative bleeding, 2 with postoperative vaginal dryness, and 1 with constipation. We conclude that LPSN is as effective as that performed by laparotomy and should be offered to patients undergoing operative laparoscopy for central dysmenorrhea and pelvic pain. This procedure should be performed only by expert endoscopists experienced in the anatomy of this region.
本研究旨在通过前瞻性连续队列研究确定腹腔镜骶前神经切除术(LPSN)的疗效,并明确其在现代妇科中的作用。103例患者接受了LPSN,其中87例纳入本研究。LPSN术后,这87例患者中有91%的盆腔疼痛有所减轻,大多数患者的疼痛评分降低了50%或更多。术前和术后疼痛水平之间存在高度显著差异(p小于0.0001)。患有子宫内膜异位症疼痛(72例)、原发性痛经(5例)和慢性盆腔炎(10例)的患者在此手术后疼痛评分降低。并发症包括1例术中出血、2例术后阴道干燥和1例便秘。我们得出结论,LPSN与开腹手术效果相同,对于因中枢性痛经和盆腔疼痛而接受手术腹腔镜检查的患者应采用该方法。此手术应由熟悉该区域解剖结构的专业内镜医师进行。