Tjaden B, Schlaff W D, Kimball A, Rock J A
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Obstet Gynecol. 1990 Jul;76(1):89-91.
The present study was undertaken to evaluate prospectively the efficacy of presacral neurectomy for the treatment of midline dysmenorrhea. All patients had moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and stage III-IV endometriosis. Of the patients undergoing presacral neurectomy (N = 17), only two had a recurrence of pain. The remainder of the patients undergoing presacral neurectomy remain pain-free at 42 months of follow-up. Of the patients undergoing resection of endometriosis but not presacral neurectomy (N = 9), none received relief of midline pain. Relief of lateral pain, back pain, and dyspareunia was variable in both groups. Our findings corroborate previous retrospective studies showing that presacral neurectomy is highly effective in the treatment of dysmenorrhea. We speculate that the most common reasons for failure of presacral neurectomy are inappropriate selection of patients and incomplete resection of the presacral nerve plexus.
本研究旨在前瞻性评估骶前神经切除术治疗中线痛经的疗效。所有患者均有中度至重度痛经及III-IV期子宫内膜异位症。在接受骶前神经切除术的患者(N = 17)中,只有2例疼痛复发。其余接受骶前神经切除术的患者在随访42个月时仍无疼痛。在接受子宫内膜异位症切除术但未接受骶前神经切除术的患者(N = 9)中,无人中线疼痛得到缓解。两组患者的侧方疼痛、背痛及性交困难缓解情况各不相同。我们的研究结果证实了先前的回顾性研究,表明骶前神经切除术在治疗痛经方面非常有效。我们推测骶前神经切除术失败的最常见原因是患者选择不当和骶前神经丛切除不完全。