Graf von den Schulenburg J M, Wähling S, Stoll M
University of Hannover, North German Center for Health Services Research (HSR), Hannover, Germany.
Pharmacoeconomics. 1996 Nov;10(5):522-34. doi: 10.2165/00019053-199610050-00009.
The purpose of this study was to discuss the cost of oral ganciclovir in comparison with its intravenous formulation in treating CMV retinitis. A cost-cost evaluation was carried out to compare the costs of oral and intravenous treatment with ganciclovir. Costs were calculated by employing the usual prices charged to sickness funds (German social health insurers). The costs of induction and maintenance therapy depend on the period of time the therapy takes, the site of administration (e.g. hospital, physician's office, patient's home) and the charges for the services. Different treatment scenarios were created in order to calculate the costs of the treatment alternatives and in a sensitivity analysis the robustness of the results was tested. Different probabilities for adverse effects were used. The study results showed that total costs of treating CMV retinitis with oral ganciclovir were substantially lower than the costs of intravenous treatment.
本研究的目的是探讨口服更昔洛韦与静脉注射用更昔洛韦治疗巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎的成本。进行了成本-成本评估,以比较口服和静脉注射更昔洛韦治疗的成本。成本是根据向疾病基金(德国社会健康保险公司)收取的常规价格计算的。诱导和维持治疗的成本取决于治疗所需的时间、给药地点(如医院、医生办公室、患者家中)以及服务费用。为了计算治疗方案的成本,创建了不同的治疗场景,并在敏感性分析中测试了结果的稳健性。使用了不同的不良反应概率。研究结果表明,口服更昔洛韦治疗巨细胞病毒性视网膜炎的总成本显著低于静脉注射治疗的成本。