Stanley H D, Charlebois E, Harb G, Jacobson M A
Department of Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr (1988). 1994 Mar;7(3):272-8.
Central venous catheters (CVC) are commonly used to deliver daily intravenous medications to patients with AIDS, and CVC-associated bacterial infections have been a cause of substantial morbidity in such patients. Although previous studies have reported rates of CVC-associated infections in AIDS patients, none has compared rates by type of intravenous drug regimen used or by whether CVCs were percutaneously placed or tunneled under the skin. The charts of all AIDS patients diagnosed with cytomegalovirus (CMV) end-organ disease at San Francisco General Hospital between 1985 and 1990 were reviewed for evidence of CVC use and CVC-associated infection. Infection rates and time to infection were analyzed for serious CVC-associated infections (requiring catheter removal or hospitalization for intravenous antibiotic therapy) by type of anti-CMV therapy administered (ganciclovir versus foscarnet) and by type of CVC (tunneled versus percutaneous placement). Fifty-four patients had 72 CVCs in use for 11,622 days of intravenous anti-CMV therapy. There were 36 CVC-associated infections of which 23 were categorized as serious (rate, 0.20/100 catheter days). In patients receiving either ganciclovir or foscarnet therapy, we found no significant difference in serious infection rates or in infection-free survival time (216 vs. 282 days, p = 0.7). However, serious CVC infection-free time was significantly longer in patients with tunneled than with percutaneous CVCs (419 vs. 195 days, p = 0.018). The use of ganciclovir compared to foscarnet in the treatment of AIDS-related CMV disease was not associated with a greater risk of serious catheter-related infection.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
中心静脉导管(CVC)常用于为艾滋病患者输注每日的静脉内药物,而与CVC相关的细菌感染一直是这类患者发病的重要原因。尽管先前的研究报告了艾滋病患者中与CVC相关的感染率,但尚无研究比较过不同静脉用药方案类型或CVC是经皮置入还是皮下隧道式置入情况下的感染率。回顾了1985年至1990年间在旧金山总医院被诊断为巨细胞病毒(CMV)终末器官疾病的所有艾滋病患者的病历,以寻找使用CVC及与CVC相关感染的证据。根据所给予的抗CMV治疗类型(更昔洛韦与膦甲酸钠)和CVC类型(皮下隧道式与经皮置入),分析了严重CVC相关感染(需要拔除导管或因静脉内抗生素治疗住院)的感染率和感染时间。54例患者使用了72根CVC进行了11622天的静脉内抗CMV治疗。发生了36例与CVC相关的感染,其中23例被归类为严重感染(发生率为0.20/100导管日)。在接受更昔洛韦或膦甲酸钠治疗的患者中,我们发现严重感染率或无感染存活时间无显著差异(分别为216天和282天,p = 0.7)。然而,皮下隧道式CVC患者的严重无CVC感染时间明显长于经皮CVC患者(分别为419天和195天,p = 0.018)。在治疗艾滋病相关CMV疾病时,使用更昔洛韦与膦甲酸钠相比,发生严重导管相关感染的风险并未增加。(摘要截选至250字)