• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Does geriatric evaluation and management improve the health behavior of older veterans in psychological distress?

作者信息

O'Donnell J C, Toseland R W

机构信息

Department of Veterans Affairs, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, USA.

出版信息

J Aging Health. 1997 Nov;9(4):473-97. doi: 10.1177/089826439700900403.

DOI:10.1177/089826439700900403
PMID:10182389
Abstract

A randomized, controlled trial compared prospective 16-month health service use among 160 frail, elderly veterans receiving outpatient geriatric evaluation and management (GEM) or usual primary care (UPC). In this secondary analysis, multivariable regression was used to determine if the psychosocial assessment and support provided by the GEM team moderated the use of medical services by patients in psychological distress. The results indicate that GEM reduced outpatient use among patients who scored higher on a measure of somatization (p less than or equal to .05), but GEM increased outpatient use among patients with higher manifest anxiety (p less than or equal to .05) Psychological distress was not a factor in the use of inpatient services. GEM had a modest beneficial effect on the health behavior of frail older persons manifesting some symptoms of psychological distress.

摘要

相似文献

1
Does geriatric evaluation and management improve the health behavior of older veterans in psychological distress?
J Aging Health. 1997 Nov;9(4):473-97. doi: 10.1177/089826439700900403.
2
Effects of geriatric evaluation and management on adverse drug reactions and suboptimal prescribing in the frail elderly.老年评估与管理对体弱老年人药物不良反应及不合理用药的影响。
Am J Med. 2004 Mar 15;116(6):394-401. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2003.10.031.
3
A controlled trial of inpatient and outpatient geriatric evaluation and management.一项住院及门诊老年医学评估与管理的对照试验。
N Engl J Med. 2002 Mar 21;346(12):905-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa010285.
4
Outpatient geriatric evaluation and management. Results of a randomized trial.门诊老年医学评估与管理。一项随机试验的结果。
Med Care. 1996 Jun;34(6):624-40. doi: 10.1097/00005650-199606000-00011.
5
Outpatient geriatric evaluation and management: is there an investment effect?门诊老年医学评估与管理:是否存在投资效应?
Gerontologist. 1997 Jun;37(3):324-32. doi: 10.1093/geront/37.3.324.
6
The effectiveness and efficiency of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management.门诊老年医学评估与管理的有效性和效率。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 1996 Jul;44(7):847-56. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1996.tb03747.x.
7
Geriatric evaluation and management units in the care of the frail elderly cancer patient.老年评估与管理单元对体弱老年癌症患者的照护
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2005 Jun;60(6):798-803. doi: 10.1093/gerona/60.6.798.
8
Impact of continued geriatric outpatient management on health outcomes of older veterans.老年门诊持续管理对老年退伍军人健康结局的影响。
Arch Intern Med. 1995 Jun 26;155(12):1313-8.
9
Demographic characteristics and clinical benefits of outpatient geriatric evaluation and management service in Taiwan.台湾地区老年门诊评估与管理服务的人口统计学特征和临床获益。
Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2012 Jul-Aug;55(1):42-4. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2011.04.016. Epub 2011 May 17.
10
Effects of a continuum of care intervention on frail older persons' life satisfaction: a randomized controlled study.连续性护理干预对体弱老年人生活满意度的影响:一项随机对照研究。
J Clin Nurs. 2015 Apr;24(7-8):1079-90. doi: 10.1111/jocn.12699. Epub 2014 Oct 8.

引用本文的文献

1
The (cost-)effectiveness of preventive, integrated care for community-dwelling frail older people: A systematic review.针对社区居家体弱老年人的预防性综合护理的(成本)效益:一项系统综述。
Health Soc Care Community. 2019 Jan;27(1):1-30. doi: 10.1111/hsc.12571. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
[Effectiveness of comprehensive geriatric assessment in primary care].[综合老年医学评估在初级保健中的有效性]
Aten Primaria. 2003 Jun 30;32(2):92-100. doi: 10.1016/s0212-6567(03)70743-4.