Phrukkanon S, Burrow M F, Tyas M J
University of Melbourne, School of Dental Science, Victoria, Australia.
J Dent. 1999 May;27(4):265-74. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(98)00060-8.
This study determined the influence of dentine structure on the micro-tensile bond strengths between resin and dentine of two different dentine adhesive systems (Single Bond, 3M Dental Products, St Paul, MN; MF-102 (experimental self-etching primer), GC Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The study was separated into two main parts: bond strength measurement and investigation of the bonding interface. Twenty-two human premolars were used for the bond strength measurement. Each tooth was cut vertically, separating the tooth into mesio-distal halves. One half of the tooth was used to bond to a surface perpendicular to the dentinal tubules and other half to bond to a surface parallel to the tubules. For each half, six locations of dentine were bonded. Each material was used in accordance to the manufacturer's directions. Cylindrical hourglass-shaped specimens of 1.2 mm diameter at the bonded interface were manufactured. The bonds were stressed in tension at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/min. Mean bond strengths were compared using LSD, one-way ANOVA, and Student's t-test. The fractured surfaces were examined under a scanning electron microscope, and the frequency of fracture modes was compared using the Kruskal-Wallis and Mann-Whitney U tests. For the investigation of the bonded interface, four teeth were prepared by the same procedure used for the bond test specimens. The bonded interfaces were observed after an acid-base treatment or fracturing across the bonded interface, prior to investigation with a field-emission scanning electron microscope. For Single Bond, the bond strengths for mid-root dentine were significantly lower than for other locations (p < 0.05). For MF-102, there was no significant difference for all locations (p > 0.05). MF-102 bonded well to all locations of dentine while Single Bond showed a porous zone at the base of the hybrid layer. The bonds were not influenced by tubule orientation. The results indicate that the bond for Single Bond may be affected by its ability to penetrate demineralised dentine in different locations of a tooth. The self-etching primer of MF-102 produces a good bond and is independent of the position on the tooth.
本研究确定了牙本质结构对两种不同牙本质粘结系统(Single Bond,3M牙科产品公司,明尼苏达州圣保罗市;MF - 102(实验性自酸蚀底漆),日本东京GC公司)的树脂与牙本质之间微拉伸粘结强度的影响。该研究分为两个主要部分:粘结强度测量和粘结界面研究。使用22颗人类前磨牙进行粘结强度测量。每颗牙齿垂直切割,将牙齿分为近远中两半。牙齿的一半用于粘结到与牙本质小管垂直的表面,另一半用于粘结到与小管平行的表面。对于每一半,粘结六个牙本质位置。每种材料均按照制造商的说明使用。制作在粘结界面处直径为1.2毫米的圆柱形沙漏形标本。以1毫米/分钟的十字头速度对粘结进行拉伸应力测试。使用最小显著差异法(LSD)、单因素方差分析和学生t检验比较平均粘结强度。在扫描电子显微镜下检查断裂表面,并使用Kruskal - Wallis检验和Mann - Whitney U检验比较断裂模式的频率。为了研究粘结界面,按照用于粘结测试标本的相同程序制备四颗牙齿。在进行场发射扫描电子显微镜检查之前,在酸碱处理或跨粘结界面断裂后观察粘结界面。对于Single Bond,牙根中部牙本质的粘结强度显著低于其他位置(p < 0.05)。对于MF - 102,所有位置均无显著差异(p > 0.05)。MF - 102与牙本质的所有位置粘结良好,而Single Bond在混合层底部显示出一个多孔区域。粘结不受小管方向的影响。结果表明,Single Bond的粘结可能受其在牙齿不同位置穿透脱矿牙本质能力的影响。MF - 102的自酸蚀底漆产生良好的粘结,且与牙齿上的位置无关。