Suppr超能文献

预先护理计划未能引出患者对于停止透析的偏好。

Failure of advance care planning to elicit patients' preferences for withdrawal from dialysis.

作者信息

Holley J L, Hines S C, Glover J J, Babrow A S, Badzek L A, Moss A H

机构信息

Department of Communication Studies, University of Rochester Medical Center, Rochester, NY, USA.

出版信息

Am J Kidney Dis. 1999 Apr;33(4):688-93. doi: 10.1016/s0272-6386(99)70220-9.

Abstract

Although withdrawal from dialysis is relatively common among dialysis patients, little is known about the patients' consideration of withdrawal during advance care planning. We studied a stratified random sample of 400 hemodialysis patients in two geographic areas (all six dialysis units within 75 miles of Morgantown, WV, and all nine dialysis units in Rochester, NY) by reviewing responses to a questionnaire addressing issues of advance care planning. Interviews were performed by trained interviewers during a routine hemodialysis treatment. Fifty-one percent of the patients had completed an advance directive (29% had a living will and a health care proxy, 22% had a living will or proxy). Patients who had completed advance directives were more likely to have notified their decision makers of their roles (91% with a living will and health care proxy, 81% with a living will or proxy v 55% who had no advance directive; P < 0.01). Most patients had not discussed their wishes for specific interventions in the event of permanent coma: 41% had discussed mechanical ventilation; 35%, tube feedings; 25%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and only 18% had discussed stopping dialysis. Patients who had completed a living will and proxy were most likely to have discussed end-of-life care, but stopping dialysis was the least often discussed intervention, even in this patient subset. Sixty-nine percent had discussed mechanical ventilation; 55%, tube feedings; 43%, cardiopulmonary resuscitation; and only 31% had discussed stopping dialysis (all P < 0.001). Although withdrawal from dialysis is relatively common, it is rarely discussed in advance care planning by dialysis patients. Dialysis unit staff and nephrologists should address issues involving withdrawal from dialysis with their chronic dialysis patients.

摘要

尽管在透析患者中停止透析相对常见,但对于患者在预立医疗计划期间对停止透析的考虑却知之甚少。我们通过回顾一份针对预立医疗计划问题的问卷回复,对两个地理区域(西弗吉尼亚州摩根敦75英里范围内的所有六个透析单位,以及纽约州罗切斯特的所有九个透析单位)的400名血液透析患者进行了分层随机抽样研究。访谈由经过培训的访谈者在常规血液透析治疗期间进行。51%的患者已完成预立医疗指示(29%有生前遗嘱和医疗保健代理人,22%有生前遗嘱或代理人)。已完成预立医疗指示的患者更有可能告知其决策者他们的角色(有生前遗嘱和医疗保健代理人的患者中91%告知了,有生前遗嘱或代理人的患者中81%告知了,而没有预立医疗指示的患者中这一比例为55%;P<0.01)。大多数患者尚未讨论过在永久昏迷情况下对特定干预措施的意愿:41%的患者讨论过机械通气;35%讨论过鼻饲;25%讨论过心肺复苏;只有18%讨论过停止透析。已完成生前遗嘱和代理人指定的患者最有可能讨论过临终护理,但停止透析是讨论最少的干预措施,即使在这个患者亚组中也是如此。69%的患者讨论过机械通气;55%讨论过鼻饲;43%讨论过心肺复苏;只有31%讨论过停止透析(所有P<0.001)。尽管停止透析相对常见,但透析患者在预立医疗计划中很少讨论这一问题。透析单位工作人员和肾病学家应与慢性透析患者讨论涉及停止透析的问题。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验