Cobb L A, Fahrenbruch C E, Walsh T R, Copass M K, Olsufka M, Breskin M, Hallstrom A P
Department of Medicine, University of Washington, Harborview Medical Center, Seattle 98104, USA.
JAMA. 1999 Apr 7;281(13):1182-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.281.13.1182.
Use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) by first arriving emergency medical technicians (EMTs) is advocated to improve the outcome for out-of-hospital ventricular fibrillation (VF). However, adding AEDs to the emergency medical system in Seattle, Wash, did not improve survival. Studies in animals have shown improved outcomes when cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) was administered prior to an initial shock for VF of several minutes' duration.
To evaluate the effects of providing 90 seconds of CPR to persons with out-of-hospital VF prior to delivery of a shock by first-arriving EMTs.
Observational, prospectively defined, population-based study with 42 months of preintervention analysis (July 1, 1990-December 31, 1993) and 36 months of post-intervention analysis (January 1, 1994-December 31, 1996).
Seattle fire department-based, 2-tiered emergency medical system.
A total of 639 patients treated for out-of-hospital VF before the intervention and 478 after the intervention.
Modification of the protocol for use of AEDs, emphasizing approximately 90 seconds of CPR prior to delivery of a shock.
Survival and neurologic status at hospital discharge determined by retrospective chart review as a function of early (<4 minutes) and later (> or =4 minutes) response intervals.
Survival improved from 24% (155/639) to 30% (142/478) (P=.04). That benefit was predominantly in patients for whom the initial response interval was 4 minutes or longer (survival, 17% [56/321] before vs 27% [60/220] after; P = .01). In a multivariate logistic model, adjusting for differences in patient and resuscitation factors between the periods, the protocol intervention was estimated to improve survival significantly (odds ratio, 1.42; 95% confidence interval, 1.07-1.90; P = .02). Overall, the proportion of victims who survived with favorable neurologic recovery increased from 17% (106/634) to 23% (109/474) (P = .01). Among survivors, the proportion having favorable neurologic function at hospital discharge increased from 71% (106/150) to 79% (109/138) (P<.11).
The routine provision of approximately 90 seconds of CPR prior to use of AED was associated with increased survival when response intervals were 4 minutes or longer.
提倡首批到达的急救医疗技术人员(EMT)使用自动体外除颤器(AED)以改善院外心室颤动(VF)的治疗效果。然而,在华盛顿州西雅图市的急救医疗系统中增加AED并未提高生存率。动物研究表明,对于持续数分钟的VF,在首次电击前进行心肺复苏(CPR)可改善治疗效果。
评估首批到达的EMT在电击前为院外VF患者提供90秒CPR的效果。
一项观察性、前瞻性定义、基于人群的研究,有42个月的干预前分析(1990年7月1日至1993年12月31日)和36个月的干预后分析(1994年1月1日至1996年12月31日)。
基于西雅图消防部门的两级急救医疗系统。
干预前共639例院外VF患者接受治疗,干预后478例。
修改AED使用方案,强调在电击前进行约90秒的CPR。
通过回顾性病历审查确定出院时的生存率和神经功能状态,作为早期(<4分钟)和晚期(≥4分钟)反应间隔的函数。
生存率从24%(155/639)提高到30%(142/478)(P = 0.04)。这种益处主要体现在初始反应间隔为4分钟或更长时间的患者中(生存率,之前为17%[56/321],之后为27%[60/220];P = 0.01)。在多变量逻辑模型中,调整不同时期患者和复苏因素的差异后,估计方案干预可显著提高生存率(优势比,1.42;95%置信区间,1.07 - 1.90;P = 0.02)。总体而言,神经功能恢复良好的存活受害者比例从17%(106/634)增加到23%(109/474)(P = 0.01)。在幸存者中,出院时神经功能良好的比例从71%(106/150)增加到79%(109/138)(P<0.11)。
当反应间隔为4分钟或更长时间时,在使用AED前常规提供约90秒的CPR与生存率提高相关。