• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

奥美拉唑与高剂量雷尼替丁治疗轻度胃食管反流病的短期和长期疗效。荷兰反流研究小组。

Omeprazole versus high-dose ranitidine in mild gastroesophageal reflux disease: short- and long-term treatment. The Dutch Reflux Study Group.

作者信息

Festen H P, Schenk E, Tan G, Snel P, Nelis F

机构信息

Department of Internal Medicine, Groot Ziekengasthuis, 's-Hertogenbosch, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.989_l.x.

DOI:10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.989_l.x
PMID:10201459
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Patients with reflux esophagitis suffer from a chronic condition that may cause considerable discomfort because of recurrent symptoms and diminished quality of life. This study was designed to evaluate acute and long-term treatment comparing standard doses of omeprazole and high-dose ranitidine.

METHODS

Patients with endoscopically verified symptomatic esophagitis grade I or II were initially treated with omeprazole 20 mg daily or ranitidine 300 mg twice daily for 4-8 wk. Patients who were symptom free were randomized to maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily or ranitidine 150 mg twice daily. Patients were seen every 3 months or at symptomatic relapse.

RESULTS

The percentage of asymptomatic patients after 4 and 8 wk treatment were 61% and 74%, respectively, for omeprazole and 31% and 50%, respectively, for ranitidine. Of 446 patients treated initially, 277 were asymptomatic, of whom 263 entered the maintenance study. The estimated proportion of patients in remission after 12 months of maintenance treatment with omeprazole 10 mg daily (n = 134) and ranitidine 150 mg twice daily (n = 129) were 68% and 39%, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Omeprazole 20 mg daily is superior to high-dose ranitidine in the symptomatic treatment of reflux esophagitis grade I and II. Furthermore, omeprazole at half the standard dose is more effective than ranitidine in a standard dose in keeping patients in remission for a period of 12 months.

摘要

目的

反流性食管炎患者患有慢性疾病,由于症状反复出现和生活质量下降,可能会导致相当大的不适。本研究旨在评估比较标准剂量奥美拉唑和高剂量雷尼替丁的急性和长期治疗效果。

方法

经内镜证实为I级或II级症状性食管炎的患者,最初接受每日20mg奥美拉唑或每日两次300mg雷尼替丁治疗4 - 8周。无症状的患者被随机分配接受每日10mg奥美拉唑或每日两次150mg雷尼替丁的维持治疗。每3个月或症状复发时对患者进行检查。

结果

治疗4周和8周后,奥美拉唑组无症状患者的百分比分别为61%和74%,雷尼替丁组分别为31%和50%。在最初治疗的446例患者中,277例无症状,其中263例进入维持治疗研究。每日10mg奥美拉唑(n = 134)和每日两次150mg雷尼替丁(n = 129)维持治疗12个月后,估计缓解患者的比例分别为68%和39%(p < 0.0001)。

结论

每日20mg奥美拉唑在I级和II级反流性食管炎的症状治疗方面优于高剂量雷尼替丁。此外,标准剂量一半的奥美拉唑在使患者缓解12个月方面比标准剂量雷尼替丁更有效。

相似文献

1
Omeprazole versus high-dose ranitidine in mild gastroesophageal reflux disease: short- and long-term treatment. The Dutch Reflux Study Group.奥美拉唑与高剂量雷尼替丁治疗轻度胃食管反流病的短期和长期疗效。荷兰反流研究小组。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1999 Apr;94(4):931-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.1999.989_l.x.
2
Omeprazole versus ranitidine or ranitidine/metoclopramide in poorly responsive symptomatic gastroesophageal reflux disease.奥美拉唑与雷尼替丁或雷尼替丁/甲氧氯普胺治疗症状性胃食管反流病反应欠佳的疗效比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 1996 Sep;91(9):1766-72.
3
Maintenance therapy for erosive esophagitis in children after healing by omeprazole: is it advisable?奥美拉唑治愈后儿童糜烂性食管炎的维持治疗:是否可取?
Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jun;102(6):1291-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01152.x. Epub 2007 Feb 23.
4
Gastroesophageal reflux disease in intellectually disabled individuals: leads for diagnosis and the effect of omeprazole therapy.智障人士的胃食管反流病:诊断线索及奥美拉唑治疗的效果
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Sep;92(9):1475-9.
5
Histamine H2 receptor antagonist-refractory oesophagitis: the efficacy of long-term omeprazole maintenance treatment.组胺H2受体拮抗剂难治性食管炎:长期奥美拉唑维持治疗的疗效
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1997 Dec;29(6):515-9.
6
A comparison of five maintenance therapies for reflux esophagitis.反流性食管炎五种维持疗法的比较。
N Engl J Med. 1995 Oct 26;333(17):1106-10. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199510263331703.
7
Daily low-dose versus alternate day full-dose lansoprazole in the maintenance treatment of reflux esophagitis.每日低剂量与隔日全剂量兰索拉唑用于反流性食管炎维持治疗的比较
Am J Gastroenterol. 2002 Jun;97(6):1357-64. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2002.05666.x.
8
Effect of omeprazole and high doses of ranitidine on gastric acidity and gastroesophageal reflux in patients with moderate-severe esophagitis.奥美拉唑和高剂量雷尼替丁对中重度食管炎患者胃酸度和胃食管反流的影响。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1990 Nov;85(11):1458-62.
9
Lansoprazole heals erosive reflux esophagitis resistant to histamine H2-receptor antagonist therapy.兰索拉唑可治愈对组胺H2受体拮抗剂疗法耐药的糜烂性反流性食管炎。
Am J Gastroenterol. 1997 Mar;92(3):429-37.
10
Quality of life during acute and intermittent treatment of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease with omeprazole compared with ranitidine. Results from a multicentre clinical trial. The European Study Group.与雷尼替丁相比,使用奥美拉唑对胃食管反流病进行急性和间歇性治疗期间的生活质量。一项多中心临床试验的结果。欧洲研究小组。
Ital J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 1998 Feb;30(1):19-27.

引用本文的文献

1
Maintenance therapy of gastroesophageal reflux disease.胃食管反流病的维持治疗
Clin J Gastroenterol. 2010 Apr;3(2):61-8. doi: 10.1007/s12328-010-0139-z. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
2
Lansoprazole for long-term maintenance therapy of erosive esophagitis: double-blind comparison with ranitidine.兰索拉唑用于糜烂性食管炎的长期维持治疗:与雷尼替丁的双盲比较。
Dig Dis Sci. 2009 May;54(5):955-63. doi: 10.1007/s10620-008-0466-9. Epub 2008 Aug 23.
3
A comparison of the cost effectiveness of pharmacotherapy or surgery (laparoscopic fundoplication) in the treatment of GORD.
药物治疗或手术(腹腔镜胃底折叠术)治疗胃食管反流病的成本效益比较。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2007;25(10):829-41. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200725100-00003.
4
A systematic review of symptomatic outcomes used in oesophagitis drug therapy trials.一项关于食管炎药物治疗试验中使用的症状性结局的系统评价。
Gut. 2004 May;53 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):iv58-65. doi: 10.1136/gut.2003.034371.
5
Improving health-related quality of life in gastro-oesophageal reflux disease.改善胃食管反流病患者与健康相关的生活质量。
Drugs. 2003;63(21):2307-16. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200363210-00003.
6
A randomised controlled trial of four management strategies for dyspepsia: relationships between symptom subgroups and strategy outcome.消化不良四种管理策略的随机对照试验:症状亚组与策略结果之间的关系
Br J Gen Pract. 2001 Aug;51(469):619-24.
7
Symptom and health-related quality-of-life measures for use in selected gastrointestinal disease studies: a review and synthesis of the literature.用于特定胃肠道疾病研究的症状及健康相关生活质量测量方法:文献综述与综合分析
Pharmacoeconomics. 2001;19(4):349-63. doi: 10.2165/00019053-200119040-00003.