• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

损伤严重程度评估调查/家长报告的开发与验证:一项新的损伤严重程度评估调查。

Development and validation of the injury severity assessment survey/parent report: a new injury severity assessment survey.

作者信息

Durbin D R, Winston F K, Applegate S M, Moll E K, Holmes J H

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, PA, USA.

出版信息

Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Apr;153(4):404-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.4.404.

DOI:10.1001/archpedi.153.4.404
PMID:10201725
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To develop and pilot test a telephone-based survey instrument that enables parents to identify and characterize the body region and severity of childhood injuries using the Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) scoring system.

DESIGN

A prospective cross-sectional survey.

SETTING

The emergency department of an urban, tertiary care, pediatric trauma center.

PARTICIPANTS

One hundred forty-seven parents of children younger than 18 years and seen in the emergency department for acute treatment of an unintentional injury.

INTERVENTIONS

None.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The degree of agreement, measured as sensitivity, specificity, and kappa statistic, between medical record information and parents' responses to the telephone survey regarding the identification and characterization of clinically significant (AIS > or =2) injuries.

RESULTS

The survey, known as the Injury Severity Assessment Survey/Parent Report, was developed via a systematic review of the AIS 1990 manual. Answers to questions were developed in a way that enabled automated coding of responses into AIS scores or ranges of scores. The sensitivity of the survey (its ability to detect injuries scoring 2 or more on the AIS that were documented in the medical record) varied somewhat by the body region of injury, ranging from 88% for head, face, neck, and spine injuries to 95% for extremity injuries. Intermediate sensitivity (92%) was noted for the detection of significant chest and abdomen injuries. The specificity of the survey (its ability to rule out the presence of a significant injury when one was not documented in the medical record) was more than 95% in each of the 3 body region groups. The kappa statistics for the 3 body region groups ranged from 0.89 to 0.92.

CONCLUSIONS

A new telephone-based survey has been developed that enables parents to characterize their child's injuries by body region and to differentiate between minor injuries and more significant injuries using a well-established injury classification system. This survey has a significant advantage over previous telephone-based or written surveys of childhood injuries and may be particularly valuable in population-based (e.g., random-digit dial surveys) or multi-institutional studies of pediatric injuries.

摘要

目的

开发并进行一项基于电话的调查工具测试,使家长能够使用简略损伤量表(AIS)评分系统识别儿童损伤的身体部位并描述其严重程度。

设计

前瞻性横断面调查。

地点

一家城市三级护理儿科创伤中心的急诊科。

参与者

147名18岁以下儿童的家长,这些儿童因意外伤害在急诊科接受急性治疗。

干预措施

无。

主要观察指标

病历信息与家长对电话调查中关于临床显著损伤(AIS≥2)的识别和描述的回答之间的一致性程度,以敏感性、特异性和kappa统计量衡量。

结果

这项名为损伤严重程度评估调查/家长报告的调查是通过对AIS 1990手册的系统回顾而开发的。问题的答案以一种能够将回答自动编码为AIS分数或分数范围的方式制定。调查的敏感性(其检测病历中记录的AIS评分为2或更高的损伤的能力)因损伤的身体部位而有所不同,从头部、面部、颈部和脊柱损伤的88%到四肢损伤的95%不等。检测胸部和腹部显著损伤的敏感性为中等(92%)。调查的特异性(当病历中未记录时排除存在显著损伤的能力)在三个身体部位组中的每一组都超过95%。三个身体部位组的kappa统计量范围为0.89至0.92。

结论

已开发出一种新的基于电话的调查,使家长能够按身体部位描述孩子的损伤,并使用成熟的损伤分类系统区分轻伤和重伤。这项调查比以前基于电话或书面的儿童损伤调查具有显著优势,在基于人群的(如随机数字拨号调查)或儿科损伤的多机构研究中可能特别有价值。

相似文献

1
Development and validation of the injury severity assessment survey/parent report: a new injury severity assessment survey.损伤严重程度评估调查/家长报告的开发与验证:一项新的损伤严重程度评估调查。
Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 1999 Apr;153(4):404-8. doi: 10.1001/archpedi.153.4.404.
2
Validation of a parent survey for reporting child injuries.家长报告儿童伤害的调查问卷验证。
Inj Prev. 2013 Oct;19(5):342-7. doi: 10.1136/injuryprev-2012-040645. Epub 2013 Feb 13.
3
The value of the injury severity score in pediatric trauma: Time for a new definition of severe injury?小儿创伤中损伤严重度评分的价值:是时候重新定义重伤了吗?
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2017 Jun;82(6):995-1001. doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000001440.
4
Standardized outcome evaluation after blunt multiple injuries by scoring systems: a clinical follow-up investigation 2 years after injury.采用评分系统对钝性多发伤进行标准化结局评估:伤后2年的临床随访调查
J Trauma. 2002 Jun;52(6):1160-8. doi: 10.1097/00005373-200206000-00023.
5
Mortality Risk in Pediatric Motor Vehicle Crash Occupants: Accounting for Developmental Stage and Challenging Abbreviated Injury Scale Metrics.儿童机动车碰撞事故乘员的死亡风险:考虑发育阶段及具有挑战性的简明损伤定级标准指标
Traffic Inj Prev. 2015;16 Suppl 2:S201-8. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2015.1048337.
6
Parental attitudes regarding interviews about injuries to their children.父母对关于其子女受伤情况访谈的态度。
Inj Prev. 2000 Mar;6(1):51-5. doi: 10.1136/ip.6.1.51.
7
Validation of Parent-Reported Injuries to Their Children.父母报告的子女受伤情况的验证
Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Sep;54(10):983-6. doi: 10.1177/0009922814566931. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
8
Acute stress disorder symptoms in children and their parents after pediatric traffic injury.儿童交通伤后儿童及其父母的急性应激障碍症状
Pediatrics. 2002 Jun;109(6):e90. doi: 10.1542/peds.109.6.e90.
9
All body region injuries are not equal: Differences in pediatric discharge functional status based on Abbreviated Injury Scale (AIS) body regions and severity scores.并非所有身体部位损伤都相同:基于简明损伤定级标准(AIS)身体区域和严重度评分的儿科出院功能状态的差异。
J Pediatr Surg. 2022 Apr;57(4):739-746. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2021.09.052. Epub 2021 Oct 9.
10
Validation of the ICD/AIS MAP for pediatric use.用于儿科的国际疾病分类/简明损伤定级映射的验证。
Inj Prev. 2001 Jun;7(2):96-9. doi: 10.1136/ip.7.2.96.

引用本文的文献

1
The association of weight percentile and motor vehicle crash injury among 3 to 8 year old children.3至8岁儿童体重百分位数与机动车碰撞伤害之间的关联。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2010;54:193-9.
2
Are overweight and obese youth at increased risk for physical activity injuries?超重和肥胖的青少年是否有更高的运动损伤风险?
Obes Facts. 2010 Aug;3(4):225-30. doi: 10.1159/000319322. Epub 2010 Aug 3.
3
Children with special physical health care needs: restraint use and injury risk in motor vehicle crashes.有特殊身体保健需求的儿童:机动车事故中的约束使用与伤害风险。
Matern Child Health J. 2011 Oct;15(7):949-54. doi: 10.1007/s10995-009-0539-1.
4
Injury risk for children in rear impacts: role of the front seat occupant.儿童在追尾事故中的受伤风险:前排乘客的作用。
Ann Adv Automot Med. 2008 Oct;52:109-16.
5
The exposure of children to deploying side air bags: an initial field assessment.儿童接触展开中的侧面安全气囊情况:初步现场评估。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:245-59.
6
Are child passengers bringing up the rear? Evidence for differential improvements in injury risk between drivers and their child passengers.儿童乘客是处于最后位置吗?关于驾驶员及其儿童乘客受伤风险差异改善的证据。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2007;51:113-27.
7
Child passenger injury risk in sibling versus non-sibling teen driver crashes: a US study.美国一项关于同胞青少年驾驶员与非同胞青少年驾驶员撞车事故中儿童乘客受伤风险的研究。
Inj Prev. 2007 Jun;13(3):207-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.014332.
8
Effect of model year and vehicle type on rollover crashes and associated injuries to children.车型年份和车辆类型对翻车事故及儿童相关伤害的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2006;50:171-84.
9
Effect of vehicle incompatibility on child occupant injury risk.车辆不相容性对儿童乘员受伤风险的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:279-92.
10
Effect of increased rear row occupancy on injury to seat belt restrained children in side impact crashes.后排乘坐人数增加对侧面碰撞事故中系安全带儿童受伤情况的影响。
Annu Proc Assoc Adv Automot Med. 2005;49:229-43.