Senserrick Teresa M, Kallan Michael J, Winston Flaura K
Center for Injury Research and Prevention (formerly TraumaLink), The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA.
Inj Prev. 2007 Jun;13(3):207-10. doi: 10.1136/ip.2006.014332.
Several international jurisdictions allow family exemptions to graduated driver licensing passenger restrictions. The objective of this research was to examine differences in injury risk to US child passengers in crashes involving sibling versus non-sibling teen drivers, and to compare outcomes with crashes involving adult drivers. Insurance claim and telephone survey data were collected on 16 233 child passengers (representing 289 329 children) in 17 US jurisdictions. There was a trend toward higher restraint non-use by child passengers in the non-sibling group than in the sibling group (9.6% vs 4.7%; p = 0.08). Children in the sibling group had a 40% lower risk of injury than those in the non-sibling group (adjusted OR 0.60, 95% CI 0.40 to 0.90); however, injury risk was higher in the sibling group than in children traveling with adults (adjusted OR 1.57, 95% CI 1.09 to 2.26). Child passengers riding with sibling teen drivers may be safer than those riding with non-sibling teens, but not as safe as those riding with adult drivers.
几个国际司法管辖区允许家庭豁免分级驾驶员执照的乘客限制。本研究的目的是调查在美国涉及兄弟姐妹青少年驾驶员与非兄弟姐妹青少年驾驶员的撞车事故中，儿童乘客受伤风险的差异，并将结果与涉及成年驾驶员的撞车事故进行比较。在美国17个司法管辖区收集了16233名儿童乘客（代表289329名儿童）的保险理赔和电话调查数据。非兄弟姐妹组儿童乘客未使用约束装置的比例有高于兄弟姐妹组的趋势（9.6%对4.7%；p=0.08）。兄弟姐妹组的儿童受伤风险比非兄弟姐妹组低40%（调整后的比值比为0.60，95%置信区间为0.40至0.90）；然而，兄弟姐妹组的受伤风险高于与成年人同行的儿童（调整后的比值比为1.57，95%置信区间为1.09至2.26）。与兄弟姐妹青少年驾驶员一起乘车的儿童乘客可能比与非兄弟姐妹青少年一起乘车的儿童更安全，但不如与成年驾驶员一起乘车的儿童安全。
