• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

腹部大手术后持续硬膜外输注罗哌卡因用于术后镇痛:与静脉自控镇痛吗啡的比较研究

Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery: comparative study with i.v. PCA morphine.

作者信息

Jayr C, Beaussier M, Gustafsson U, Leteurnier Y, Nathan N, Plaud B, Tran G, Varlet C, Marty J

机构信息

Institut Gustave Roussy, Département d'Anesthésie, Villejuif, France.

出版信息

Br J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;81(6):887-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.6.887.

DOI:10.1093/bja/81.6.887
PMID:10211014
Abstract

We have compared the quality of three regimens of postoperative analgesia (continuous epidural administration of ropivacaine (Ropi. group), epidural ropivacaine and patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) with i.v. morphine (Ropi. + PCA group) and PCA morphine alone (PCA group)) during the first postoperative 24 h in a multicentre, randomized, prospective study. Postoperative analgesia was studied in 130 patients after major abdominal surgery performed under general anaesthesia. The ropivacaine groups received 20 ml of epidural bolus ropivacaine 2 mg ml-1 via the epidural route at the end of surgery, followed by continuous infusion of 10 ml h-1 for 24 h. The Ropi. + PCA group also had access to i.v. PCA morphine 1 mg, with a 5-min lockout. The PCA group received morphine as the sole postoperative pain treatment. The two ropivacaine groups had lower pain scores (P < 0.01) than the PCA group. Morphine consumption was higher in the PCA group (P < 0.05) than in the two ropivacaine groups. The quality of pain relief was rated as good or excellent in 79-85% of patients in the three groups. The percentage of patients without motor block increased between 4 and 24 h from 61% to 89% in the Ropi. group, and from 51% to 71% in the Ropi. + PCA group.

摘要

在一项多中心、随机、前瞻性研究中,我们比较了三种术后镇痛方案(罗哌卡因持续硬膜外给药(罗哌卡因组)、硬膜外罗哌卡因联合静脉注射吗啡患者自控镇痛(罗哌卡因+PCA组)和单纯PCA吗啡(PCA组))在术后24小时内的效果。对130例在全身麻醉下接受腹部大手术的患者进行了术后镇痛研究。罗哌卡因组在手术结束时经硬膜外途径给予20ml负荷剂量的2mg/ml罗哌卡因,随后以10ml/h的速度持续输注24小时。罗哌卡因+PCA组还可静脉注射PCA吗啡1mg,锁定时间为5分钟。PCA组将吗啡作为唯一的术后疼痛治疗药物。两个罗哌卡因组的疼痛评分均低于PCA组(P<0.01)。PCA组的吗啡消耗量高于两个罗哌卡因组(P<0.05)。三组中79%-85%的患者疼痛缓解质量被评为良好或优秀。罗哌卡因组无运动阻滞的患者百分比在4至24小时之间从61%增加到89%,罗哌卡因+PCA组从51%增加到71%。

相似文献

1
Continuous epidural infusion of ropivacaine for postoperative analgesia after major abdominal surgery: comparative study with i.v. PCA morphine.腹部大手术后持续硬膜外输注罗哌卡因用于术后镇痛:与静脉自控镇痛吗啡的比较研究
Br J Anaesth. 1998 Dec;81(6):887-92. doi: 10.1093/bja/81.6.887.
2
A comparison of 0.1% and 0.2% ropivacaine and bupivacaine combined with morphine for postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia after major abdominal surgery.0.1%和0.2%罗哌卡因及布比卡因与吗啡联合用于腹部大手术后患者自控硬膜外镇痛的比较
Anesth Analg. 2002 Aug;95(2):444-9, table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200208000-00039.
3
Postoperative extradural analgesia with morphine and ropivacaine. A double-blind comparison between placebo and ropivacaine 10 mg/h or 16 mg/h.吗啡与罗哌卡因用于术后硬膜外镇痛。安慰剂与10毫克/小时或16毫克/小时罗哌卡因的双盲对照研究。
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2005 Sep;49(8):1191-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2005.00715.x.
4
Double epidural catheter with ropivacaine versus intravenous morphine: a comparison for postoperative analgesia after scoliosis correction surgery.罗哌卡因双硬膜外导管与静脉注射吗啡用于脊柱侧弯矫正术后镇痛的比较
Anesthesiology. 2005 Jan;102(1):175-80. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200501000-00026.
5
Postoperative analgesia by combined continuous infusion and patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) following hip replacement: ropivacaine versus bupivacaine.髋关节置换术后连续输注联合患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)的镇痛效果:罗哌卡因与布比卡因的比较
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2001 Jul;45(6):782-5. doi: 10.1034/j.1399-6576.2001.045006782.x.
6
The analgesic efficacy of subcostal transversus abdominis plane block compared with thoracic epidural analgesia and intravenous opioid analgesia after radical gastrectomy.根治性胃切除术后肋缘下腹横肌平面阻滞与胸段硬膜外镇痛和静脉阿片类药物镇痛的镇痛效果比较。
Anesth Analg. 2013 Aug;117(2):507-13. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318297fcee. Epub 2013 Jun 6.
7
The postoperative analgesic efficacy of preperitoneal continuous wound infusion compared to epidural continuous infusion with local anesthetics after colorectal cancer surgery: a randomized controlled multicenter study.直肠癌手术后腹腔连续灌洗与硬膜外持续输注局麻药的术后镇痛效果比较:一项随机对照多中心研究。
Anesth Analg. 2012 Dec;115(6):1442-50. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826b4694. Epub 2012 Nov 9.
8
[Sufentanil vs morphine combined with ropivacaine for thoracic epidural analgesia in major abdominal surgery].[舒芬太尼与吗啡联合罗哌卡因用于腹部大手术胸段硬膜外镇痛的比较]
Minerva Anestesiol. 2001 Sep;67(9 Suppl 1):155-9.
9
The addition of epidural morphine to ropivacaine improves epidural analgesia after lower abdominal surgery.在下腹部手术后,将硬膜外吗啡添加到罗哌卡因中可改善硬膜外镇痛效果。
Can J Anaesth. 2005 Feb;52(2):181-5. doi: 10.1007/BF03027726.
10
Intermittent epidural vs continuous wound infusion of ropivacaine for acute and chronic pain control after hysterectomy or myomectomy: a randomized controlled trial.间歇性硬膜外注射与罗哌卡因持续伤口灌注用于子宫切除术或子宫肌瘤切除术后急慢性疼痛控制的随机对照试验
Pain Med. 2014 Sep;15(9):1603-8. doi: 10.1111/pme.12523. Epub 2014 Aug 4.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparative Study of 0.5% Bupivacaine, 0.5% Ropivacaine, and 0.75% Ropivacaine With Fentanyl as a Continuous Intraoperative Epidural Infusion on Post-operative Analgesia.0.5%布比卡因、0.5%罗哌卡因和0.75%罗哌卡因联合芬太尼持续术中硬膜外输注用于术后镇痛的比较研究
Cureus. 2024 May 1;16(5):e59477. doi: 10.7759/cureus.59477. eCollection 2024 May.
2
Epidural Analgesia Improves Postoperative Pain Control but Impedes Early Discharge in Patients Undergoing Pancreatic Surgery.硬膜外镇痛可改善胰腺手术后患者的术后疼痛控制,但会阻碍其早期出院。
Pancreas. 2019 May/Jun;48(5):719-725. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0000000000001311.
3
Epidural analgesia versus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia for pain following intra-abdominal surgery in adults.
成人腹部手术后疼痛的硬膜外镇痛与患者自控静脉镇痛对比
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Aug 30;8(8):CD010434. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010434.pub2.
4
Comparison of the Effects of Sufentanil and Fentanyl Intravenous Patient Controlled Analgesia after Lumbar Fusion.舒芬太尼与芬太尼用于腰椎融合术后静脉自控镇痛效果的比较
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2017 Jan 1;60(1):54-59. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2016.0707.007. Epub 2016 Dec 29.
5
Epidural local anaesthetics versus opioid-based analgesic regimens for postoperative gastrointestinal paralysis, vomiting and pain after abdominal surgery.硬膜外局部麻醉药与阿片类镇痛方案用于腹部手术后胃肠道麻痹、呕吐及疼痛的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Jul 16;7(7):CD001893. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001893.pub2.
6
Anaesthetic Considerations in the Perioperative Management of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy.减瘤手术及热灌注化疗围手术期管理中的麻醉考量
Indian J Surg Oncol. 2016 Jun;7(2):236-43. doi: 10.1007/s13193-016-0508-2. Epub 2016 Feb 20.
7
Improved peri-operative outcomes with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing a pancreatectomy: a nationwide analysis.胰十二指肠切除患者采用硬膜外镇痛改善围手术期结局:一项全国性分析
HPB (Oxford). 2015 Jun;17(6):551-8. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12392. Epub 2015 Feb 28.
8
A comparison of the effect of epidural patient-controlled analgesia with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia on pain control after posterior lumbar instrumented fusion.硬膜外自控镇痛与静脉自控镇痛对腰椎后路器械融合术后疼痛控制效果的比较。
J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2011 Sep;50(3):205-8. doi: 10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.205. Epub 2011 Sep 30.
9
Ropivacaine: A review of its pharmacology and clinical use.罗哌卡因:其药理学与临床应用综述。
Indian J Anaesth. 2011 Mar;55(2):104-10. doi: 10.4103/0019-5049.79875.
10
Ropivacaine: a review of its use in regional anaesthesia and acute pain management.罗哌卡因:其在区域麻醉和急性疼痛管理中的应用综述。
Drugs. 2005;65(18):2675-717. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200565180-00013.