• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

三维腹腔镜检查。是噱头还是进步?一项关于三维腹腔镜检查疗效的随机试验。

Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.

作者信息

Mueller M D, Camartin C, Dreher E, Hänggi W

机构信息

Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University of Bern, Schanzeneckstrasse 1, CH-3012 Bern, Switzerland.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):469-72. doi: 10.1007/s004649901014.

DOI:10.1007/s004649901014
PMID:10227944
Abstract

BACKGROUND

This study was designed to compare conventional laparoscopy with three-dimensional (3-D) laparoscopy.

METHOD

Thirty candidates, 20 inexperienced and 10 experienced in operative laparoscopy, executed standardized exercises on a pelvitrainer. The candidates were randomized to two groups. Group A executed the exercises first with the conventional and then with the three-dimensional system. Group B accomplished the exercises in the reverse sequence. At the end of the exercises, the candidates answered specific questions about the two systems.

RESULTS

A total of 21 h 6 min 6 sec of laparoscopic exercises were analyzed-10 h 8 min 1 sec with the conventional and 10 h 58 min 5 sec with the three-dimensional system (p = 0.38). Group A required 12 h 26 min 56 sec to perform all the exercises. There was no statistically significant difference from group B, where the candidates needed 8 h 39 min 10 sec (p = 0.14). Neither were there any differences in the number of failed attempts between the two groups. There were also no statistical difference when the results obtained from the candidates without experience in laparoscopy and the participants experienced in operative laparoscopy were analyzed separately. Both the inexperienced and the experienced candidates became tired earlier, had more headaches, and needed extra time to adapt to the 3-D system.

CONCLUSION

When analyzed in a standardized fashion, 3-D laparoscopy does not have any significant advantages over conventional laparoscopy.

摘要

背景

本研究旨在比较传统腹腔镜检查与三维(3-D)腹腔镜检查。

方法

30名受试者,其中20名无腹腔镜手术经验,10名有腹腔镜手术经验,在盆腔训练器上进行标准化练习。受试者被随机分为两组。A组先使用传统系统后使用三维系统进行练习。B组按相反顺序完成练习。练习结束时,受试者回答关于这两种系统的特定问题。

结果

共分析了21小时6分6秒的腹腔镜练习——使用传统系统为10小时8分1秒,使用三维系统为10小时58分5秒(p = 0.38)。A组完成所有练习需要12小时26分56秒。与B组相比无统计学显著差异,B组受试者需要8小时39分10秒(p = 0.14)。两组之间失败尝试的次数也无差异。分别分析无腹腔镜手术经验的受试者和有腹腔镜手术经验的参与者的结果时也无统计学差异。无经验和有经验的受试者都更早感到疲劳,头痛更多,并且需要额外时间来适应三维系统。

结论

以标准化方式分析时,三维腹腔镜检查与传统腹腔镜检查相比没有任何显著优势。

相似文献

1
Three-dimensional laparoscopy. Gadget or progress? A randomized trial on the efficacy of three-dimensional laparoscopy.三维腹腔镜检查。是噱头还是进步?一项关于三维腹腔镜检查疗效的随机试验。
Surg Endosc. 1999 May;13(5):469-72. doi: 10.1007/s004649901014.
2
Comparison of two-dimensional vs three-dimensional camera systems in laparoscopic surgery.腹腔镜手术中二维与三维摄像系统的比较
Surg Endosc. 1997 May;11(5):438-40. doi: 10.1007/s004649900385.
3
The influence of three-dimensional video systems on laparoscopic task performance.三维视频系统对腹腔镜任务操作的影响。
Surg Laparosc Endosc. 1996 Jun;6(3):191-7.
4
Impact of 3D vision on mental workload and laparoscopic performance in inexperienced subjects.三维视觉对缺乏经验者心理负荷及腹腔镜操作表现的影响
Actas Urol Esp. 2015 May;39(4):229-35. doi: 10.1016/j.acuro.2014.09.008. Epub 2014 Nov 12.
5
2D Versus 3D in Laparoscopic Surgery by Beginners and Experts: A Randomized Controlled Trial on a Pelvitrainer in Objectively Graded Surgical Steps.初学者与专家在腹腔镜手术中二维与三维的比较:一项关于在客观分级手术步骤的盆腔训练器上进行的随机对照试验
J Surg Educ. 2017 Sep-Oct;74(5):867-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
6
The 3-D monitor and head-mounted display. A quantitative evaluation of advanced laparoscopic viewing technologies.三维监视器和头戴式显示器。先进腹腔镜观察技术的定量评估。
Surg Endosc. 1999 Aug;13(8):751-5. doi: 10.1007/s004649901092.
7
Effect of video lag on laparoscopic surgery: correlation between performance and usability at low latencies.视频延迟对腹腔镜手术的影响:低延迟下性能与可用性之间的相关性
Int J Med Robot. 2017 Jun;13(2). doi: 10.1002/rcs.1758. Epub 2016 Jul 3.
8
Image converter eliminates mirror imaging during laparoscopy.图像转换器可消除腹腔镜检查过程中的镜像现象。
J Endourol. 2003 Jun;17(5):327-31. doi: 10.1089/089277903322145521.
9
Is a robotic system really better than the three-dimensional laparoscopic system in terms of suturing performance?: comparison among operators with different levels of experience.就缝合性能而言,机器人系统真的比三维腹腔镜系统更好吗?:不同经验水平操作者之间的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2016 Apr;30(4):1485-90. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4357-9. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Three-dimensional imaging improved the laparoscopic performance of inexperienced operators: a prospective trial.三维成像提高了经验不足的腹腔镜手术医生的手术表现:一项前瞻性试验。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Nov;34(11):5083-5091. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07308-6. Epub 2019 Dec 6.

引用本文的文献

1
The effects of 3D/Full HD and 2D/Ultra HD imaging systems on suturing skills during total laparoscopic hysterectomy: a prospective cohort study.3D/全高清和 2D/超高清成像系统对腹腔镜全子宫切除术缝合技能的影响:一项前瞻性队列研究。
Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Mar;309(3):1027-1033. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07335-8. Epub 2024 Jan 7.
2
Comparison of perioperative, oncologic, and functional outcomes between 3D and 2D laparoscopic radical prostatectomy: a systemic review and meta-analysis.三维与二维腹腔镜根治性前列腺切除术围手术期、肿瘤学及功能结局的比较:一项系统评价与荟萃分析
Front Oncol. 2023 Sep 19;13:1249683. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1249683. eCollection 2023.
3
Which video technology brings the higher cognitive burden and motion sickness in laparoscopic colorectal surgery: 3D, 2D-4 K or 3D-4 K? a propensity score study.
哪种视频技术在腹腔镜结直肠手术中带来更高的认知负担和运动病:3D、2D-4K 还是 3D-4K?一项倾向评分研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jul 10;38(1):190. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04491-w.
4
Usefulness of three-dimensional thoracoscope for prone position thoracoscopic esophagectomy improves mediastinal lymph node dissection and prognosis for esophageal cancer.三维胸腔镜在俯卧位胸腔镜食管切除术治疗食管癌中的应用,提高了纵隔淋巴结清扫术和食管癌患者的预后。
Cancer Rep (Hoboken). 2023 Aug;6(8):e1850. doi: 10.1002/cnr2.1850. Epub 2023 Jun 20.
5
Does 3D laparoscopic video technology affect long-term survival in right hemicolectomy for cancer compared to standard 2D? A propensity score study.与标准二维腹腔镜技术相比,三维腹腔镜视频技术会影响右半结肠癌切除术的长期生存率吗?一项倾向评分研究。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Jan 10;38(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s00384-022-04297-2.
6
Laparoscopic surgery in 3D improves results and surgeon convenience in sleeve gastrectomy for morbid obesity.腹腔镜 3D 技术在病态肥胖的袖状胃切除术中改善了手术结果和外科医生的便利性。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2022 Dec;407(8):3333-3340. doi: 10.1007/s00423-022-02681-8. Epub 2022 Oct 1.
7
A randomized, controlled trial comparing the clinical outcomes of 3D versus 2D laparoscopic hysterectomy.一项比较三维与二维腹腔镜子宫切除术临床结局的随机对照试验。
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Mar;17(1):127-133. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2021.105724. Epub 2021 Apr 30.
8
Three-Dimensional (3D) Laparoscopy Versus Two-Dimensional (2D) Laparoscopy: A Single-Surgeon Prospective Randomized Comparative Study.三维(3D)腹腔镜与二维(2D)腹腔镜:单外科医生前瞻性随机对照研究。
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2020 Oct 1;21(10):2883-2887. doi: 10.31557/APJCP.2020.21.10.2883.
9
Comparison of short-term surgical outcome between 3D and 2D laparoscopy surgery for gastrointestinal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.3D 与 2D 腹腔镜手术治疗胃肠道癌症的短期手术结局比较:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020 Feb;405(1):1-12. doi: 10.1007/s00423-020-01853-8. Epub 2020 Jan 22.
10
3D presentation in surgery: a review of technology and adverse effects.手术中的 3D 呈现:技术与不良反应综述。
J Robot Surg. 2019 Jun;13(3):363-370. doi: 10.1007/s11701-018-00900-3. Epub 2018 Dec 15.