Spille Johannes, Wenners Antonia, von Hehn Ulrike, Maass Nicolai, Pecks Ulrich, Mettler Liselotte, Alkatout Ibrahim
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany.
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, University Hospitals Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany; Department of Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Center Kiel, Park Clinic, Kiel, Germany.
J Surg Educ. 2017 Sep-Oct;74(5):867-877. doi: 10.1016/j.jsurg.2017.01.011. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Progress in endoscopic surgery in the past few decades has led to the application of 3-dimensional (3D) procedures in operating rooms. This permits patient- and surgeon-friendly operations and also maximizes the superiority of laparoscopy over laparotomy. In this study, we compare 2-dimensional (2D) and 3D endoscopy techniques with regard to time, efficiency, optics, and handling by users with different degrees of experience at 4 difficulty levels.
A randomized controlled trial on a pelvitrainer in objectively graded surgical steps for students and postgraduates.
The trials took place at the Kiel School of Gynaecological Endoscopy, a training unit of the Kiel University Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, a tertiary academic medical center.
The 277 study participants, divided into students, residents, and specialists, worked on pelvitrainers with 2 different optical systems, the 2D full HD and the 3D mode. The following 4 exercises were performed with each optical system: (1) grasping and transferring of pins, (2) cutting predetermined marks, (3) vaginal closure with prevention of prolapse, and (4) sacrocolpopexy. The duration and success of the tasks were measured and compared. A self-assessment questionnaire was completed by the participants.
Overall, the 3D-system permitted a greater improvement in working speed, superior optical visualization, and better endoscopic handling in all groups, independent of surgical experience. All students improved in speed (exercises: 1-3) and made significantly fewer mistakes (exercise 2) on 3D compared with 2D. Residents made progress in time (exercises: 1-4) and task performance (exercise 3). Specialists improved significantly in the more challenging tasks 3 and 4. Subjectively, 68.8% of participants preferred 3D for performing laparoscopy.
Systematic training programs on pelvitrainers can improve endoscopic skills not only in beginners but also in experienced surgeons. The 3D system offered distinct advantages over 2D imaging and was well accepted by surgeons.
过去几十年间,内镜手术取得的进展促使三维(3D)手术在手术室中得到应用。这使得手术对患者和外科医生都更为友好,同时也将腹腔镜手术相对于开腹手术的优势最大化。在本研究中,我们在4个难度级别上,就时间、效率、光学效果以及不同经验程度使用者的操作情况,对二维(2D)和三维内镜技术进行了比较。
针对学生和研究生,在盆腔训练器上进行客观分级手术步骤的随机对照试验。
试验在基尔大学妇产科系的培训单位——基尔妇科内镜学校进行,该单位是一家三级学术医疗中心。
277名研究参与者分为学生、住院医师和专家,他们使用两种不同的光学系统——2D全高清和3D模式,在盆腔训练器上进行操作。每种光学系统都进行以下4项练习:(1)抓取和转移别针;(2)切割预定标记;(3)预防脱垂的阴道闭合术;(4)骶骨阴道固定术。测量并比较各项任务的持续时间和完成情况。参与者完成一份自我评估问卷。
总体而言,3D系统在所有组中都能带来工作速度的更大提升、更出色的光学可视化效果以及更好的内镜操作体验,且与手术经验无关。与2D相比,所有学生在速度方面(练习1 - 3)均有提高,在3D模式下进行练习2时所犯错误显著减少。住院医师在时间(练习1 - 4)和任务完成情况(练习3)方面取得了进步。专家在更具挑战性的任务3和4中显著提高。主观上,68.8%的参与者更喜欢使用3D进行腹腔镜手术。
在盆腔训练器上进行系统培训项目不仅可以提高初学者的内镜技能,也能提升经验丰富的外科医生的技能。3D系统相较于2D成像具有明显优势,并且受到外科医生的广泛认可。