Amis T C, Kirkness J P, di Somma E, Wheatley J R
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Westmead Hospital, and University of Sydney, Westmead, New South Wales 2145, Australia.
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1999 May;86(5):1638-43. doi: 10.1152/jappl.1999.86.5.1638.
We studied the effect of an adhesive external nasal dilator strip (ENDS) on external nasal geometry in 20 healthy Caucasian adults (10 men, 10 women; age 21-45 yr). The recoil force exerted by ENDS was estimated by bending the device (n = 10) with known weights. In the horizontal direction, a small/medium-sized ENDS in situ exerted a unilateral recoil force of 21.4-22.6 g. Application of ENDS resulted in a displacement of the lateral nasal vestibule walls that had both anterosuperior and horizontal components and that was maintained over an 8-h period. The resultant unilateral nasal vestibule wall displacement at the tip of the device was at 47.6 +/- 2.0 degrees to the horizontal (as related to the plane of the device when in situ) and had a magnitude of 3.5 +/- 0.1 mm. ENDS increased external nasal cross-sectional area by 23.0-65.3 mm2. Nasal vestibule wall compliance was estimated at 0.05-0.16 mm/g. Thus ENDS applies a relatively constant abducting force irrespective of nasal width. Variable responsiveness to ENDS may be related to differences in elastic properties of the nasal vestibule wall.