Callipo C
Ann Ist Super Sanita. 1976;12(2-3):218-32.
The Author takes up the subject of the report in order to carry out a comprehensive legal recognition of the mineral water regulations in Italy and emphasizes that in this field the results of scientific conclusions, or rather of the various scientific branches (medical hydrology, microbiology, chemics, hydrogeology, medical clinics, pharmacology, etc.) supply a cognitive support to the legislator and the substantial contents to the legal standards. He therefore illustrates the two main outlines of the rules, i.e. the hygienic sanitary one and the mineral one: such lay-out is subsequently related to the implementation of the Regions on one hand and to the enforcement of CEE-rules on the other. This has led to the fact that the hygienic-sanitary legislation was confirmed to the State while the mineral one was transferred to the Regions. After having shown up contrasts and expressed the necessity of clearness and uniformity of rules and criteria, the Author connects these requirements mainly with the implementation of hygienic-sanitary surveillance and consequently with the evaluation of the banal bacterical contents under the point of view of merit--i.e. the rules should include the probative results of science--as well as from a point of view of coordinated allotments of competence by the various organisms.
作者着手撰写本报告,旨在对意大利矿泉水法规进行全面的法律认定,并强调在这一领域,科学结论,或者更确切地说,各个科学分支(医用水文地质学、微生物学、化学、水文地质学、医学临床、药理学等)的成果为立法者提供了认知支持,并为法律标准提供了实质内容。因此,他阐述了法规的两个主要框架,即卫生健康框架和矿物质框架:随后,这种框架一方面与各地区的实施情况相关,另一方面与欧洲经济共同体法规的执行情况相关。这导致了卫生健康立法归国家负责,而矿物质立法则移交给各地区。在指出了矛盾之处并表达了规则和标准清晰统一的必要性之后,作者将这些要求主要与卫生健康监督的实施联系起来,并因此从价值角度对常见细菌含量的评估联系起来——即法规应纳入科学的证明结果——以及从各机构协调分配权限的角度联系起来。