Birch S, Donaldson C
J Health Econ. 1987 Sep;6(3):211-25. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(87)90009-9.
In applying the principles of cost-benefit analysis to real world problems of resource allocation particular care must be taken to ensure that the welfare economic theory which underlies the cost-benefit technique is adhered to. Major problems arise where costs and benefits are used interchangeably to represent the good and bad attributes of a programme. Furthermore, in the presence of mutually exclusive projects, focussing attention upon the net benefits (or cost-benefit ratios) of individual projects as opposed to the net benefits of the use of budgeted resources can lead to biased estimates of the shadow price of projects and, consequently, errors in analysts' conclusions. As a result, economic appraisals of individual projects are not directly relevant for choosing between mutually exclusive projects of different sizes. Both types of problem are illustrated by reference to both simple examples and published economic appraisals of health care techniques. Integer programming is proposed and demonstrated as a method of selecting between mutually exclusive projects.
在将成本效益分析原则应用于现实世界的资源分配问题时,必须格外小心,以确保遵循作为成本效益技术基础的福利经济理论。当成本和效益被交替使用来代表一个项目的好坏属性时,就会出现重大问题。此外,在存在互斥项目的情况下,将注意力集中在单个项目的净效益(或成本效益比)上,而不是预算资源使用的净效益,可能会导致对项目影子价格的估计有偏差,从而导致分析师结论出现错误。因此,单个项目的经济评估对于在不同规模的互斥项目之间进行选择并不直接相关。通过简单示例和已发表的医疗保健技术经济评估来阐述这两类问题。整数规划被提出并证明是一种在互斥项目之间进行选择的方法。