• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

食物开发:探寻最优加入策略。

Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy.

作者信息

Giraldeau LA, Beauchamp G

出版信息

Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Mar;14(3):102-106. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01542-0.

DOI:10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01542-0
PMID:10322509
Abstract

Commonly invoked foraging advantages of group membership include increased mean food intake rates and/or reduced variance in foraging success. These foraging advantages rely on the occurrence of 'joining': feeding from food discovered or captured by others. Joining occurs in most social species but the assumptions underlying its analysis have been clarified only recently, giving rise to two classes of model: information-sharing and producer-scrounger models. Recent experimental evidence suggests that joining in ground-feeding birds might be best analysed as a producer-scrounger game, with some intriguing consequences for the spatial distribution of foragers and patch exploitation.

摘要

通常提到的群体成员觅食优势包括平均食物摄入量增加和/或觅食成功率的方差降低。这些觅食优势依赖于“加入”行为的发生:从其他个体发现或捕获的食物中获取食物。加入行为在大多数社会性物种中都存在,但对其分析所基于的假设直到最近才得以阐明,从而产生了两类模型:信息共享模型和生产者-窃取者模型。最近的实验证据表明,地面觅食鸟类的加入行为可能最好被分析为一种生产者-窃取者博弈,这对觅食者的空间分布和斑块利用有着一些有趣的影响。

相似文献

1
Food exploitation: searching for the optimal joining policy.食物开发:探寻最优加入策略。
Trends Ecol Evol. 1999 Mar;14(3):102-106. doi: 10.1016/s0169-5347(98)01542-0.
2
Daily Patterns of Optimal Producer and Scrounger Use under Predation Hazard: A State-Dependent Dynamic Game Analysis.捕食风险下最优生产者和窃取者使用的每日模式:一种状态依赖动态博弈分析
Am Nat. 2000 Apr;155(4):570-582. doi: 10.1086/303342.
3
Experimental evidence that group foragers can converge on predicted producer-scrounger equilibria.有实验证据表明群体觅食者能够趋向于预测的生产者-寄生者均衡状态。
Anim Behav. 2000 Sep;60(3):341-350. doi: 10.1006/anbe.2000.1474.
4
LEARNING TO CHOOSE AMONG SOCIAL FORAGING STRATEGIES IN ADULT HOUSE SPARROWS (Passer domesticus).成年家麻雀(Passer domesticus)学习在社会觅食策略中做出选择。
Ethology. 2012 Nov 1;118(11):1111-1121. doi: 10.1111/eth.12013. Epub 2012 Sep 12.
5
The patch distributed producer-scrounger game.分布式搭便车生产者-觅食者游戏的补丁。
J Theor Biol. 2009 Sep 21;260(2):261-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2009.06.002. Epub 2009 Jun 6.
6
Learning rules for social foragers: implications for the producer-scrounger game and ideal free distribution theory.群居觅食者的学习规则:对生产者-偷窃者博弈及理想自由分布理论的启示
J Theor Biol. 2000 Nov 7;207(1):21-35. doi: 10.1006/jtbi.2000.2153.
7
An asymmetric producer-scrounger game: body size and the social foraging behavior of coho salmon.一种不对称的生产者-掠夺者博弈:体型与银大麻哈鱼的社会觅食行为
Theor Ecol. 2018;11(4):417-431. doi: 10.1007/s12080-018-0375-2. Epub 2018 May 1.
8
Individual-learning ability predicts social-foraging strategy in house sparrows.个体学习能力预测麻雀的社会觅食策略。
Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 22;278(1705):582-9. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2010.1151. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
9
Stable producer-scrounger dynamics in wild birds: sociability and learning speed covary with scrounging behaviour.野生鸟类中稳定的生产者-窃取者动态:社交性和学习速度与窃取行为共同变化。
Proc Biol Sci. 2017 Apr 12;284(1852). doi: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2872.
10
An evolutionary perspective on social inequality and health disparities: Insights from the producer-scrounger game.社会不平等与健康差距的进化视角:生产者-掠夺者博弈的启示
Evol Med Public Health. 2023 Aug 16;11(1):294-308. doi: 10.1093/emph/eoad026. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Heterogeneous responsiveness to environmental stimuli.对环境刺激的异质性反应。
Behav Ecol. 2025 Aug 16;36(4):araf023. doi: 10.1093/beheco/araf023. eCollection 2025 Jul-Aug.
2
Adaptive mechanisms of social and asocial learning in immersive collective foraging.沉浸式集体觅食中社会学习与非社会学习的适应性机制。
Nat Commun. 2025 Apr 25;16(1):3539. doi: 10.1038/s41467-025-58365-6.
3
Abundant resources can trigger reduced consumption: Unveiling the paradox of excessive scrounging.丰富的资源可能会导致消费减少:揭示过度索取的悖论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2024 Mar 26;121(13):e2322955121. doi: 10.1073/pnas.2322955121. Epub 2024 Mar 19.
4
Lévy movements and a slowly decaying memory allow efficient collective learning in groups of interacting foragers.勒维运动和逐渐衰减的记忆使得群体中的相互作用觅食者能够有效地进行集体学习。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2023 Oct 16;19(10):e1011528. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1011528. eCollection 2023 Oct.
5
A guide to area-restricted search: a foundational foraging behaviour.区域限制搜索指南:一种基础性的觅食行为。
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2022 Dec;97(6):2076-2089. doi: 10.1111/brv.12883. Epub 2022 Jul 12.
6
Follow the leader? Orange-fronted conures eavesdrop on conspecific vocal performance and utilise it in social decisions.随大流?橙额鹦鹉倾听同种个体的叫声表现,并在社会决策中加以利用。
PLoS One. 2021 Jun 9;16(6):e0252374. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252374. eCollection 2021.
7
Shared decision-making allows subordinates to lead when dominants monopolize resources.当主导者垄断资源时,共同决策允许下属发挥主导作用。
Sci Adv. 2020 Nov 25;6(48). doi: 10.1126/sciadv.aba5881. Print 2020 Nov.
8
Effect of conspecific neighbors on the foraging activity levels of the wintering Oriental Storks (): Benefits of social information.同种邻居对越冬东方白鹳觅食活动水平的影响():社会信息的益处。
Ecol Evol. 2020 Aug 30;10(19):10384-10394. doi: 10.1002/ece3.6693. eCollection 2020 Oct.
9
Social interactions drive efficient foraging and income equality in groups of fish.社会互动促进鱼类群体的高效觅食和收入平等。
Elife. 2020 Aug 25;9:e56196. doi: 10.7554/eLife.56196.
10
Multiyear social stability and social information use in reef sharks with diel fission-fusion dynamics.具有昼夜裂变-融合动力学的礁鲨的多年社会稳定性和社会信息利用。
Proc Biol Sci. 2020 Aug 12;287(1932):20201063. doi: 10.1098/rspb.2020.1063.