Woods G L, Bergmann J S, Witebsky F G, Fahle G A, Wanger A, Boulet B, Plaunt M, Brown B A, Wallace R J
Department of Pathology, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas 77555-0740, USA.
J Clin Microbiol. 1999 Jun;37(6):1676-82. doi: 10.1128/JCM.37.6.1676-1682.1999.
A multicenter study was conducted to assess the interlaboratory reproducibility of broth microdilution testing of the more common rapidly growing pathogenic mycobacteria. Ten isolates (four Mycobacterium fortuitum group, three Mycobacterium abscessus, and three Mycobacterium chelonae isolates) were tested against amikacin, cefoxitin, ciprofloxacin, clarithromycin, doxycycline, imipenem, sulfamethoxazole, and tobramycin (M. chelonae only) in four laboratories. At each site, isolates were tested three times on each of three separate days (nine testing events per isolate) with a common lot of microdilution trays. Agreement among MICs (i.e., mode +/- 1 twofold dilution) varied considerably for the different drug-isolate combinations and overall was best for cefoxitin (91.7 and 97.2% for one isolate each and 100% for all others), followed by doxycycline, amikacin, and ciprofloxacin. Agreement based on the interpretive category, using currently suggested breakpoints, also varied and overall was best for doxycycline (97.2% for one isolate and 100% for the rest), followed by ciprofloxacin and clarithromycin. Reproducibility among MICs and agreement by interpretive category was most variable for imipenem. Based on results reported from the individual sites, it appears that inexperience contributed significantly to the wide range of MICs of several drugs, especially clarithromycin, ciprofloxacin, and sulfamethoxazole. New interpretive guidelines are presented for the testing of M. fortuitum against clarithromycin; M. abscessus and M. chelonae against the aminoglycosides; and all three species against cefoxitin, doxycycline, and imipenem.
开展了一项多中心研究,以评估对较常见的快速生长致病分枝杆菌进行肉汤微量稀释试验的实验室间再现性。在四个实验室中,对10株分离株(4株偶然分枝杆菌组、3株脓肿分枝杆菌和3株龟分枝杆菌分离株)进行了阿米卡星、头孢西丁、环丙沙星、克拉霉素、多西环素、亚胺培南、磺胺甲恶唑和妥布霉素(仅针对龟分枝杆菌)的检测。在每个地点,使用同一批次的微量稀释板,在三个不同的日子里对分离株各进行三次检测(每个分离株进行9次检测)。不同药物-分离株组合的最低抑菌浓度(MIC)之间的一致性(即众数±1个两倍稀释度)差异很大,总体上头孢西丁的一致性最佳(每种分离株分别为91.7%和97.2%,其他所有分离株为100%),其次是多西环素、阿米卡星和环丙沙星。根据目前建议的断点,基于解释类别得出的一致性也有所不同,总体上多西环素的一致性最佳(一株分离株为97.2%,其余为100%),其次是环丙沙星和克拉霉素。亚胺培南的MIC之间的再现性和解释类别一致性变化最大。根据各个地点报告的结果,经验不足似乎是几种药物(尤其是克拉霉素、环丙沙星和磺胺甲恶唑)的MIC范围广泛的重要原因。针对偶然分枝杆菌对克拉霉素的检测;脓肿分枝杆菌和龟分枝杆菌对氨基糖苷类药物的检测;以及所有三种分枝杆菌对头孢西丁、多西环素和亚胺培南的检测,提出了新的解释性指南。