• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Four key questions that identify severe disability.识别严重残疾的四个关键问题。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jan;80(1):67-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.1.67.
2
A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies.早产儿预防性容量扩张试验中两种随访方法的比较。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;12(2):199-216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00099.x.
3
Parents' evaluation of developmental status in children born with a birthweight of 1250 g or less.出生体重1250克及以下儿童父母对其发育状况的评估。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2005 Apr;41(4):191-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2005.00586.x.
4
Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden.瑞典积极围产期护理后极低出生体重儿 2.5 岁时的神经发育结局。
JAMA. 2013 May 1;309(17):1810-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3786.
5
Disabled children in the UK: a quality assessment of quantitative data sources.英国的残疾儿童:定量数据来源的质量评估
Child Care Health Dev. 2010 Jan;36(1):130-41. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01017.x. Epub 2009 Sep 4.
6
Randomised trial of prophylactic early fresh-frozen plasma or gelatin or glucose in preterm babies: outcome at 2 years. Northern Neonatal Nursing Initiative Trial Group.早产儿预防性早期输注新鲜冰冻血浆、明胶或葡萄糖的随机试验:2岁时的结局。北方新生儿护理倡议试验组。
Lancet. 1996 Jul 27;348(9022):229-32.
7
Rates of early intervention services in very preterm children with developmental disabilities at age 2 years.2岁发育障碍的极早产儿的早期干预服务率。
J Paediatr Child Health. 2008 May;44(5):276-80. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.2007.01251.x. Epub 2007 Nov 12.
8
[Sequelae of premature birth: substantial medical consumption and physical limitations; survey among parents of 10-year-olds].[早产后遗症:大量医疗消耗与身体限制;对10岁孩子父母的调查]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 1998 Jan 17;142(3):138-42.
9
Screening for disability in a community: the 'ten questions' screen for children, in Bondo, Kenya.肯尼亚邦多地区社区儿童残疾筛查:“十个问题”筛查法
Afr Health Sci. 2003 Apr;3(1):33-9.
10
Neurodevelopmental disabilities and special care of 5-year-old children born before 33 weeks of gestation (the EPIPAGE study): a longitudinal cohort study.神经发育障碍与孕33周前出生的5岁儿童的特殊护理(EPIPAGE研究):一项纵向队列研究
Lancet. 2008 Mar 8;371(9615):813-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60380-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental outcome of extremely low birth weight infants from the Vermont Oxford network: 1998-2003.佛蒙特州牛津网络极低出生体重儿的神经发育结果:1998-2003 年。
Neonatology. 2010 Jun;97(4):329-38. doi: 10.1159/000260136. Epub 2009 Nov 24.
2
A comparison of findings on parents' and teachers' questionnaires, and detailed ophthalmic and psychological assessments.对家长问卷和教师问卷的调查结果、详细的眼科评估和心理评估进行比较。
Arch Dis Child. 2004 Sep;89(9):831-5. doi: 10.1136/adc.2003.029470.
3
The Magpie Trial follow up study: outcome after discharge from hospital for women and children recruited to a trial comparing magnesium sulphate with placebo for pre-eclampsia [ISRCTN86938761].喜鹊试验随访研究:纳入比较硫酸镁与安慰剂治疗子痫前期试验的妇女和儿童出院后的结局 [国际标准随机对照试验编号86938761]
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2004 Mar 8;4(1):5. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-4-5.

本文引用的文献

1
A comparison of two methods of follow-up in a trial of prophylactic volume expansion in preterm babies.早产儿预防性容量扩张试验中两种随访方法的比较。
Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1998 Apr;12(2):199-216. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-3016.1998.00099.x.
2
UK collaborative randomised trial of neonatal extracorporeal membrane oxygenation. UK Collaborative ECMO Trail Group.英国新生儿体外膜肺氧合协作随机试验。英国体外膜肺氧合协作试验组。
Lancet. 1996 Jul 13;348(9020):75-82.
3
Potential value of four early developmental milestones in screening children for increased risk of later retardation.四个早期发育里程碑在筛查儿童后期发育迟缓风险增加方面的潜在价值。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 1969 Aug;11(4):423-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.1969.tb01460.x.
4
Validity of the 'Ten Questions' for screening serious childhood disability: results from urban Bangladesh.用于筛查儿童严重残疾的“十个问题”的有效性:来自孟加拉国城市地区的结果
Int J Epidemiol. 1990 Sep;19(3):613-20. doi: 10.1093/ije/19.3.613.
5
Is late walking a marker of morbidity? Steering Committee, Oxford Region Child Development Project.走路晚是发病的一个指标吗?牛津地区儿童发展项目指导委员会
Arch Dis Child. 1990 May;65(5):486-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.65.5.486.

识别严重残疾的四个关键问题。

Four key questions that identify severe disability.

作者信息

Fooks J

机构信息

National Perinatal Epidemiology Unit, Radcliffe Infirmary, Oxford, UK.

出版信息

Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jan;80(1):67-8. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.1.67.

DOI:10.1136/adc.80.1.67
PMID:10325762
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1717806/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Six hundred and four surviving children aged 2 years, who had been entered into a neonatal trial of fresh frozen plasma on the incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage, were grouped into four categories of disability based on a review by a full paediatric assessment. A 29 item questionnaire completed by the children's health visitors was used to group the children into the same categories.

AIMS

To explore whether severe disability could be identified by using only a few of the 29 questions.

METHOD

The sensitivity and specificity of individual questions were used first to find the subset of questions that best identified children with severe disability. The efficacy of the four most useful questions was tested in a separate cohort of 105 children for whom health visitors had completed questionnaires at the age of 2 years, and who had similarly been assessed by a paediatrician.

RESULTS

In the original trial cohort, the four questions correctly identified 56 of the 61 children with the most severe disabilities as assessed by the paediatrician, and seven children were falsely identified as being severely disabled. In the second cohort, the four questions correctly identified six of the seven children classified as severely disabled by the paediatrician, with no false positives.

CONCLUSION

If four such questions were included in routine child information systems at age 2 years, it might be possible to obtain useful data on the prevalence of severe disability in children.

摘要

背景

604名存活的2岁儿童曾参与一项关于新鲜冰冻血浆对脑室内出血发生率影响的新生儿试验,根据全面儿科评估结果,这些儿童被分为四类残疾等级。儿童健康访视员填写的一份包含29个条目的问卷也将这些儿童分为相同的类别。

目的

探讨仅使用这29个问题中的几个是否就能识别出严重残疾儿童。

方法

首先利用单个问题的敏感性和特异性来找出最能识别严重残疾儿童的问题子集。在另一组105名儿童中测试了四个最有用问题的有效性,这些儿童的健康访视员在他们2岁时已填写问卷,并且他们同样接受了儿科医生的评估。

结果

在最初的试验队列中,这四个问题正确识别出了61名经儿科医生评估为最严重残疾儿童中的56名,有7名儿童被错误地认定为严重残疾。在第二个队列中,这四个问题正确识别出了7名经儿科医生分类为严重残疾儿童中的6名,且无假阳性结果。

结论

如果在儿童2岁时的常规儿童信息系统中纳入四个这样的问题,或许有可能获得有关儿童严重残疾患病率的有用数据。