Knight G, Noyes J
School of Education, University of Birmingham, UK.
Ergonomics. 1999 May;42(5):747-60. doi: 10.1080/001401399185423.
Children spend a large part of their school days in the classroom, and yet the effect of the design of school furniture on their behaviour and health has received comparatively little attention in the UK. An experimental study is reported that compares the effects on children's behaviour and sitting position of traditional classroom furniture with a recently designed chair known as 'Chair 2000' and associated tables. It was found that children showed a modest but significant improvement in on-task behaviour and a marked change in sitting positions following the introduction of the newly-designed furniture. However, these benefits need to be considered in the light of polarized opinion for and against the new furniture, and a high level of reported incidence of back pain significantly related to the frequency of non-standard sitting. In the absence of radically redesigned furniture, it is suggested that children should be given more choice in their seating, and better guidance should be given to individuals involved in education in order to inform their decision-making about classroom furniture and the postural, anthropometric and orthopaedic aspects of sitting and related activities.
孩子们在学校的大部分时间都待在教室里,然而在英国,学校家具的设计对他们行为和健康的影响却相对很少受到关注。本文报道了一项实验研究,该研究比较了传统教室家具与一种名为“2000型椅子”及相关桌子对孩子们行为和坐姿的影响。研究发现,引入新设计的家具后,孩子们在专注任务行为上有适度但显著的改善,坐姿也有明显变化。然而,鉴于对新家具支持和反对的两极化观点,以及报告显示背痛发生率较高且与非标准坐姿频率显著相关,这些益处需要综合考虑。在没有彻底重新设计家具的情况下,建议给予孩子们更多座位选择,并为教育相关人员提供更好的指导,以便他们在决定教室家具以及坐姿和相关活动的姿势、人体测量学和矫形方面的问题时能够做出明智决策。