Muschik M, Schlenzka D, Robinson P N, Kupferschmidt C
Department of Pediatric Orthopedics, Orthopedic Clinic of the Charité Hospital, Humboldt-University Berlin, Germany.
Eur Spine J. 1999;8(2):93-9. doi: 10.1007/s005860050136.
The radiographic and clinical outcomes and complications among two groups of adolescent patients treated for idiopathic thoracic scoliosis with dorsal instrumentation using a unified implantation system (Universal Spinal System) were compared retrospectively. A total of 69 patients were included in the study. In 30 patients an intraoperative correction of the scoliosis was performed by translation and segmental correction (translation group, Helsinki). In 39 patients the correction was achieved according to the Cotrel-Dubousset rod rotation maneuver (rod rotation group, Berlin). The goal of the present study is to investigate whether one of the operative procedures leads to a better correction of idiopathic adolescent thoracic scoliosis than the other. The mean follow-up interval was 30 months, with a minimum of 12 months. There were no significant preoperative differences in age (15+/-2 years in both groups), gender, or type of scoliosis (King types 2, 3, and 4). The preoperative radiographic measurements showed no significant differences between the two groups. In both patient groups, the thoracic primary curve, the lumbar secondary curve and the thoracic apical rotation were improved by the operation. Lumbar apical rotation and the sagittal profile were unchanged in both groups. The thoracic primary curve was corrected from 50 degrees +/-6 degrees to 24 degrees +/-7 degrees in the translation group and from 54 degrees +/-11 degrees to 220 degrees +/-11 degrees in the rod rotation group. The extent of the correction of the thoracic curve was significantly greater in the rod rotation group than in the translation group (59% vs. 52% correction). In contrast, the translation procedure seems to have a more beneficial effect on spinal balance than rod rotation. Neurological complications did not occur. In both patient groups an increase in the non-instrumented lumbar curve was noted, in two cases each. In three patients from the rod rotation group the instrumentation had to be removed due to a late infection with negative microbiological results.
回顾性比较两组采用统一植入系统(通用脊柱系统)行后路器械固定治疗特发性胸椎侧弯的青少年患者的影像学和临床结果及并发症。本研究共纳入69例患者。30例患者术中通过平移和节段性矫正进行脊柱侧弯矫正(平移组,赫尔辛基)。39例患者根据Cotrel-Dubousset棒旋转操作进行矫正(棒旋转组,柏林)。本研究的目的是调查两种手术方法中是否有一种比另一种能更好地矫正特发性青少年胸椎侧弯。平均随访时间为30个月,最短12个月。两组患者术前在年龄(均为15±2岁)、性别或侧弯类型(King 2型、3型和4型)方面无显著差异。术前影像学测量显示两组之间无显著差异。两组患者的胸椎主弯、腰椎次弯和胸椎顶椎旋转度均通过手术得到改善。两组患者的腰椎顶椎旋转度和矢状面外形均未改变。平移组胸椎主弯从50°±6°矫正至24°±7°,棒旋转组从54°±11°矫正至22°±11°。棒旋转组胸椎弯的矫正程度显著大于平移组(矫正率分别为59%和52%)。相比之下,平移手术似乎对脊柱平衡的影响比棒旋转更有益。未发生神经并发症。两组患者均发现非器械固定的腰椎弯有增加,每组各有2例。棒旋转组有3例患者因后期感染且微生物学检查结果为阴性而不得不取出内固定器械。