Parmenter K, Wardle J
ICRF Health Behaviour Unit, University College London.
Eur J Clin Nutr. 1999 Apr;53(4):298-308. doi: 10.1038/sj.ejcn.1600726.
This paper describes the development of a reliable and valid questionnaire to provide a comprehensive measure of the nutritional knowledge of UK adults. The instrument will help to identify areas of weakness in people's understanding of healthy eating and will also provide useful data for examining the relationship between nutrition knowledge and dietary behaviour which, up until now, has been far from clear.
Items were generated paying particular attention to content validity. The initial version of the questionnaire was piloted and assessed on psychometric criteria. Items which did not reach acceptable validity were excluded, and the final 50 item version was administered to two groups differing in nutritional expertise on two occasions to assess the construct validity and test-retest reliability.
The questionnaire was developed in 1994 in the UK.
Three hundred and ninety-one members of the general public, recruited via their places of work, completed the questionnaire at the piloting stage. The final version was administered to 168 dietetics and computer science students following a university lecture.
The internal consistency of each section was high (Cronbach's alpha = 0.70-0.97) and the test-retest reliability was also well above the minimum requirement of 0.7. Nutrition experts scored significantly better than computer experts [F(1167) = 200.5, P<0.001], suggesting good construct validity.
The findings demonstrate that the instrument meets psychometric criteria for reliability and construct validity. It should provide a useful scale with which to reassess the relationship between knowledge and dietary behaviour.
本文描述了一份可靠且有效的问卷的开发过程,该问卷旨在全面衡量英国成年人的营养知识。该工具将有助于找出人们在理解健康饮食方面的薄弱环节,还将为研究营养知识与饮食行为之间的关系提供有用数据,而迄今为止,这种关系还远未明确。
生成项目时特别关注内容效度。问卷的初始版本进行了预试验,并根据心理测量标准进行评估。未达到可接受效度的项目被排除,最终的50项版本在两个营养专业知识不同的组中进行了两次施测,以评估结构效度和重测信度。
该问卷于1994年在英国开发。
通过工作场所招募的391名普通公众在预试验阶段完成了问卷。最终版本在大学讲座后对168名营养学和计算机科学专业的学生进行了施测。
各部分的内部一致性较高(克朗巴哈系数=0.70 - 0.97),重测信度也远高于最低要求0.7。营养专家的得分显著高于计算机专家[F(1,167)=200.5,P<0.001],表明结构效度良好。
研究结果表明该工具符合可靠性和结构效度的心理测量标准。它应为重新评估知识与饮食行为之间的关系提供一个有用的量表。