Suppr超能文献

致病性奈瑟菌的实验室鉴定,特别关注非典型菌株:糖降解、免疫荧光和协同凝集试验的评估

Laboratory identification of pathogenic Neisseria with special regard to atypical strains: an evaluation of sugar degradation, immunofluorescence and co-agglutination tests.

作者信息

Olcén P, Danielsson D, Kjellander J

出版信息

Acta Pathol Microbiol Scand B. 1978 Dec;86B(6):327-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1699-0463.1978.tb00052.x.

Abstract

Sugar degradation tests (SDT) were compared with immunofluorescence (IFL) and co-agglutination (COA) tests for the diagnosis of Neisseria gonorrhoeae (GC) and Neisseria meningitidis (MC). Somewhat more than 5% of the GC strains and 8% of the MC strains were misinterpreted by SDT. On most occasions the disagreement between SDT and serological tests was due to the inability of the MC strains (less so for GC strains) to degrade sugars correctly. Because of this, three out of 15 strains (20%) from pharyngeal specimens were primarily considered to be GC by SDT but were identified as MC by COA tests. Deficiencies in sugar degradations were also found in a group of clinical problem strains. Many of them were unable or had a decreased ability to degrade glucose or maltose but were diagnosed distinctly as MC by the COA test. There were no false positives with the IFL or COA tests, but 2% of the GC strains and 26% of the MC carrier strains (non-groupable) were not identified by COA. Both IFL and COA tests are good adjuncts to SDT for the diagnosis of GC and clinically significant MC, since the results are reliable and the tests rapid and simple to perform.

摘要

为诊断淋病奈瑟菌(GC)和脑膜炎奈瑟菌(MC),对糖降解试验(SDT)与免疫荧光试验(IFL)和协同凝集试验(COA)进行了比较。SDT对略多于5%的GC菌株和8%的MC菌株存在误判。在大多数情况下,SDT与血清学试验之间的不一致是由于MC菌株(GC菌株情况稍轻)不能正确降解糖类。因此,15份咽拭子标本中的3株(20%)菌株,SDT最初判定为GC,但COA试验鉴定为MC。在一组临床问题菌株中也发现了糖类降解缺陷。其中许多菌株无法降解或降解葡萄糖或麦芽糖的能力下降,但COA试验明确诊断为MC。IFL或COA试验均无假阳性,但COA未鉴定出2%的GC菌株和26%的MC携带菌株(不可分组)。IFL和COA试验都是SDT诊断GC和具有临床意义的MC的良好辅助手段,因为结果可靠,试验快速且操作简单。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验