Thomas M B
Leverhulme Unit for Population Biology and Biological Control, Natural Environment Research Council Centre for Population Biology and CABI Bioscience, Silwood Park, Ascot, Berks., SL5 7PY, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999 May 25;96(11):5944-51. doi: 10.1073/pnas.96.11.5944.
Recent predictions of growth in human populations and food supply suggest that there will be a need to substantially increase food production in the near future. One possible approach to meeting this demand, at least in part, is the control of pests and diseases, which currently cause a 30-40% loss in available crop production. In recent years, strategies for controlling pests and diseases have tended to focus on short-term, single-technology interventions, particularly chemical pesticides. This model frequently applies even where so-called integrated pest management strategies are used because in reality, these often are dominated by single technologies (e.g., biocontrol, host plant resistance, or biopesticides) that are used as replacements for chemicals. Very little attention is given to the interaction or compatibility of the different technologies used. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that such approaches rarely yield satisfactory results and are unlikely to provide sustainable pest control solutions for the future. Drawing on two case histories, this paper demonstrates that by increasing our basic understanding of how individual pest control technologies act and interact, new opportunities for improving pest control can be revealed. This approach stresses the need to break away from the existing single-technology, pesticide-dominated paradigm and to adopt a more ecological approach built around a fundamental understanding of population biology at the local farm level and the true integration of renewable technologies such as host plant resistance and natural biological control, which are available to even the most resource-poor farmers.
近期对人口增长和粮食供应的预测表明,在不久的将来有必要大幅增加粮食产量。至少部分满足这一需求的一种可能方法是控制病虫害,目前病虫害导致可获得的作物产量损失30%-40%。近年来,控制病虫害的策略往往侧重于短期的单一技术干预措施,尤其是化学农药。即使在使用所谓的综合病虫害管理策略的情况下,这种模式也经常适用,因为实际上,这些策略往往由单一技术(如生物防治、寄主植物抗性或生物农药)主导,这些技术被用作化学农药的替代品。很少有人关注所使用的不同技术之间的相互作用或兼容性。不幸的是,有证据表明,此类方法很少能产生令人满意的结果,而且不太可能为未来提供可持续的病虫害防治解决方案。本文通过两个案例表明,通过加深我们对个体病虫害防治技术如何发挥作用及相互作用的基本理解,可以发现改善病虫害防治的新机会。这种方法强调需要摆脱现有的以单一技术、农药为主导的模式,采用一种更具生态学意义的方法,该方法基于对当地农场层面种群生物学的基本理解以及对可再生技术(如寄主植物抗性和自然生物防治)的真正整合,即使是资源最匮乏的农民也可采用这些技术。