Suppr超能文献

用于内镜手术的23.5千赫兹超声激活装置产热的实验研究

Experimental study on heat production by a 23.5-kHz ultrasonically activated device for endoscopic surgery.

作者信息

Kinoshita T, Kanehira E, Omura K, Kawakami K, Watanabe Y

机构信息

Department of Surgery (1), Kanazawa University School of Medicine, 13-1 Takaramachi, Kanazawa, 920-8641 Japan.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 1999 Jun;13(6):621-5. doi: 10.1007/s004649901055.

Abstract

An experimental study was carried out to evaluate heat production by an ultrasonically activated device (USAD) using an animal model. In an anesthetized living pig, the gastroepiploic and mesenteric vessels were coagulated and cut by an USAD at a power level of 70% (n = 8) or 100% (n = 8). During the division, the time-discrete temperature change on the surface of the animal tissue adjacent to the blade was measured by thermography. To compare the USAD with conventional electrocautery (EC), a full-thickness incision of the gastric wall was performed by each device, and the temperature change was measured. With the USAD, the temperature increased gradually and remained below 150 degrees C during the entire activating time at both power levels. By contrast, with EC at 30 W, the temperature increased rapidly and exceeded 350 degrees C within only a few seconds. The area above 60 degrees C reached a final width of 10 mm for the USAD, as compared with 22 mm for EC. Microscopically, thermal alterations such as carbonization and vaporization were much more severe and extensive in the adjacent tissue when using EC rather than the USAD. With the USAD, heat production is much slower and more limited than with conventional EC; thus, the USAD causes fewer thermal alterations in adjacent tissue. USAD should be preferred for tissue coagulation and cutting during endscopic surgery.

摘要

进行了一项实验研究,以使用动物模型评估超声激活设备(USAD)的产热情况。在一只麻醉的活猪身上,胃网膜血管和肠系膜血管在70%功率水平(n = 8)或100%功率水平(n = 8)下被USAD凝固并切断。在切割过程中,通过热成像测量与刀片相邻的动物组织表面随时间离散的温度变化。为了将USAD与传统电灼术(EC)进行比较,每种设备都对胃壁进行了全层切口,并测量了温度变化。使用USAD时,在两个功率水平下,温度在整个激活时间内逐渐升高并保持在150摄氏度以下。相比之下,使用30W的EC时,温度迅速升高,仅在几秒钟内就超过了350摄氏度。对于USAD,60摄氏度以上的区域最终宽度达到10毫米,而EC为22毫米。在显微镜下,使用EC时,相邻组织中的碳化和汽化等热改变比使用USAD时严重得多且范围更广。与传统EC相比,USAD产热要慢得多且受限得多;因此,USAD在相邻组织中引起的热改变较少。在 endoscopic 手术中进行组织凝固和切割时,应首选 USAD。 (注:原文中“endscopic”疑似拼写错误,可能是“endoscopic”,即“内镜的”)

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验