• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital.针对新转诊癌症患者的共享护理计划的随机对照试验:弥合全科医疗与医院之间的差距
Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):263-72. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.263.
2
Randomised controlled trial protocol (GRIP study): examining the effect of involvement of a general practitioner and home care oncology nurse after a cancer diagnosis on patient reported outcomes and healthcare utilization.随机对照试验方案(GRIP 研究):研究在癌症诊断后,普通医生和家庭癌症护理护士的参与对患者报告的结局和医疗保健利用的影响。
BMC Cancer. 2018 Feb 5;18(1):132. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4005-6.
3
Pragmatic randomised trial to evaluate the use of patient held records for the continuing care of patients with cancer.评估使用患者保存记录用于癌症患者持续护理的实用性随机试验。
Qual Health Care. 2001 Sep;10(3):159-65. doi: 10.1136/qhc.0100159...
4
The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.在全科医疗中,直接转诊进行快速CT扫描对早期肺癌检测的效果。一项临床、整群随机试验。
Dan Med J. 2015 Mar;62(3).
5
Exploratory cluster randomised controlled trial of shared care development for long-term mental illness.针对长期精神疾病的共享护理发展探索性整群随机对照试验。
Br J Gen Pract. 2004 Apr;54(501):259-66.
6
Who should provide care for patients receiving palliative chemotherapy? A qualitative study among Dutch general practitioners and oncologists.谁应该为接受姑息化疗的患者提供护理?一项针对荷兰全科医生和肿瘤学家的定性研究。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2018 Dec;36(4):437-445. doi: 10.1080/02813432.2018.1535264. Epub 2018 Oct 30.
7
Improving communication between the general practitioner and the oncologist: a key role in coordinating care for patients suffering from cancer.提高全科医生和肿瘤医生之间的沟通:协调癌症患者护理的关键角色。
BMC Cancer. 2020 Jun 1;20(1):495. doi: 10.1186/s12885-020-06993-0.
8
Improving continuity by bringing the cancer patient, general practitioner and oncologist together in a shared video-based consultation - protocol for a randomised controlled trial.通过在基于视频的共享咨询中将癌症患者、全科医生和肿瘤医生聚集在一起来提高连续性 - 一项随机对照试验的方案。
BMC Fam Pract. 2019 Jun 25;20(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12875-019-0978-8.
9
Referrals from general practice to consultants in Germany: if the GP is the initiator, patients' experiences are more positive.德国从全科医疗向专科医生的转诊:如果全科医生是转诊的发起者,患者的体验会更积极。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2006 Jan 19;6:5. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-6-5.
10
General practitioner assessment of structured oncological information accompanying newly referred cancer patients.全科医生对新转诊癌症患者附带的结构化肿瘤学信息的评估。
Scand J Prim Health Care. 2003 Jun;21(2):110-4. doi: 10.1080/02813430310001725.

引用本文的文献

1
Challenges of Cross-Sectoral Video Consultation in Cancer Care on Patients' Perceived Coordination: Randomized Controlled Trial.癌症护理中跨部门视频会诊对患者感知协调的挑战:随机对照试验
JMIR Cancer. 2025 Feb 11;11:e60158. doi: 10.2196/60158.
2
Shared Local Oncology Care After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Cell Transplantation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.异基因造血细胞移植后的共享局部肿瘤护理:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA Oncol. 2025 Mar 1;11(3):268-275. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2024.5786.
3
Identification of interventions to improve patient experienced quality of care in transitions between healthcare settings: a scoping review.确定改善医疗环境之间患者体验护理质量的干预措施:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):1155. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11609-5.
4
Content validity of patient-reported measures evaluating experiences of the quality of transitions in healthcare settings-a scoping review.评估患者在医疗保健环境中经历的过渡质量的报告测量的内容效度:范围综述。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Jul 22;24(1):828. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11298-0.
5
Eliciting Older Cancer Patients' Preferences for Follow-Up Care to Inform a Primary Healthcare Follow-Up Model in China: A Discrete Choice Experiment.采用离散选择实验探究老年癌症患者对随访护理的偏好,为中国初级医疗保健随访模式提供信息。
Patient. 2024 Sep;17(5):589-601. doi: 10.1007/s40271-024-00697-4. Epub 2024 May 3.
6
Measures used to assess interventions for increasing patient involvement in Danish healthcare setting: a rapid review.评估干预措施以增加丹麦医疗保健环境中患者参与度的方法:快速综述。
BMJ Open. 2022 Dec 26;12(12):e064067. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-064067.
7
Factors influencing the translation of shared cancer follow-up care into clinical practice: a systematic review.影响共享癌症随访护理转化为临床实践的因素:系统评价。
BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 29;12(8):e055460. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055460.
8
Effects of structured involvement of the primary care team versus standard care after a cancer diagnosis on patient satisfaction and healthcare use: the GRIP randomised controlled trial.癌症诊断后初级保健团队的结构化参与与标准护理对患者满意度和医疗保健利用的影响:GRIP 随机对照试验。
BMC Prim Care. 2022 Jun 4;23(1):145. doi: 10.1186/s12875-022-01746-3.
9
[Not Available].[无可用内容]。
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2021 May 1;31(2):175-185. doi: 10.5737/23688076312175185. eCollection 2021 Spring.
10
Shared-care model for complex chronic haematological malignancies.复杂慢性血液系统恶性肿瘤的共享照护模式
Can Oncol Nurs J. 2021 May 1;31(2):165-174. doi: 10.5737/23688076312165174. eCollection 2021 Spring.

本文引用的文献

1
Measuring patients' attitudes to care across the primary/secondary interface: the development of the patient career diary.衡量患者在初级/二级医疗界面的护理态度:患者就医历程日记的编制
Qual Health Care. 1999 Sep;8(3):154-60. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.3.154.
2
Left in limbo: patients' views on care across the primary/secondary interface.陷入困境:患者对初级/二级医疗衔接中护理的看法。
Qual Health Care. 1999 Mar;8(1):16-21. doi: 10.1136/qshc.8.1.16.
3
[Cross-sectorial cooperation regarding cancer patients in a recently started care program. Ideas and themes based on focus group interviews with general practitioners and oncologists].[在一个新启动的护理项目中关于癌症患者的跨部门合作。基于对全科医生和肿瘤学家的焦点小组访谈得出的想法和主题]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1999 Apr 5;161(14):2074-8.
4
Recent advances: oncology.最新进展:肿瘤学
BMJ. 1999 Feb 13;318(7181):445-8. doi: 10.1136/bmj.318.7181.445.
5
[Cross-sectional therapeutic programs--an example of a cooperative health care system. A review with comments].[横断面治疗项目——合作医疗系统的一个实例。附评论的综述]
Ugeskr Laeger. 1998 Aug 24;160(35):5021-4.
6
The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer approach to developing questionnaire modules: an update and overview. EORTC Quality of Life Study Group.欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织开发问卷模块的方法:最新情况与概述。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量研究组
Qual Life Res. 1998 May;7(4):291-300. doi: 10.1023/a:1024977728719.
7
Validation of the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality of life questionnaire through combined qualitative and quantitative assessment of patient-observer agreement.通过对患者-观察者一致性进行定性和定量综合评估来验证欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷QLQ-C30。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1997 Apr;50(4):441-50. doi: 10.1016/s0895-4356(96)00428-3.
8
Cancer in remission. Challenge in collaboration for family physicians and oncologists.癌症缓解。家庭医生与肿瘤学家合作面临的挑战。
Can Fam Physician. 1996 May;42:899-904; 907-10.
9
Shared care: a review of the literature.共享护理:文献综述
Fam Pract. 1996 Jun;13(3):264-79. doi: 10.1093/fampra/13.3.264.
10
Confiding in crisis: gender differences in pattern of confiding among cancer patients.危机中的倾诉:癌症患者倾诉模式的性别差异
Soc Sci Med. 1995 Nov;41(9):1255-60. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(94)00411-l.

针对新转诊癌症患者的共享护理计划的随机对照试验:弥合全科医疗与医院之间的差距

Randomised controlled trial of a shared care programme for newly referred cancer patients: bridging the gap between general practice and hospital.

作者信息

Nielsen J D, Palshof T, Mainz J, Jensen A B, Olesen F

机构信息

Department and Research Unit for General Practice, University of Aarhus, Aarhus, Denmark.

出版信息

Qual Saf Health Care. 2003 Aug;12(4):263-72. doi: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.263.

DOI:10.1136/qhc.12.4.263
PMID:12897359
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC1743735/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of a shared care programme on the attitudes of newly referred cancer patients towards the healthcare system and their health related quality of life and performance status, and to assess patients' reports on contacts with their general practitioner (GP).

SETTING

Department of Oncology at Aarhus University Hospital and general practices.

DESIGN

Randomised controlled trial in which patients completed questionnaires at three time points. The shared care programme included transfer of knowledge from the oncologist to the GP, improved communication between the parties, and active patient involvement.

PARTICIPANTS

248 consecutive cancer patients recently referred to the department.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Patients' attitudes towards the healthcare services, their health related quality of life, performance status, and reports on contacts with their GPs.

RESULTS

The shared care programme had a positive effect on patient evaluation of cooperation between the primary and secondary healthcare sectors. The effect was particularly significant in men and in younger patients (18-49 years) who felt they received more care from the GP and were left less in limbo. Young patients in the intervention group rated the GP's knowledge of disease and treatment significantly higher than young patients in the control group. The number of contacts with the GP was significantly higher in the intervention group. The EORTC quality of life questionnaire and performance status showed no significant differences between the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

An intersectoral shared care programme in which GPs and patients are actively involved has a positive influence on patients' attitudes towards the healthcare system. Young patients and men particularly benefit from the programme.

摘要

目的

确定一项共享护理计划对新转诊癌症患者对医疗保健系统的态度、其健康相关生活质量和功能状态的影响,并评估患者关于与全科医生(GP)接触情况的报告。

背景

奥胡斯大学医院肿瘤科及全科医疗诊所。

设计

随机对照试验,患者在三个时间点完成问卷调查。共享护理计划包括从肿瘤学家向全科医生传授知识、改善双方沟通以及患者积极参与。

参与者

248名近期转诊至该科室的连续癌症患者。

主要观察指标

患者对医疗服务的态度、其健康相关生活质量、功能状态以及关于与全科医生接触情况的报告。

结果

共享护理计划对患者对初级和二级医疗保健部门之间合作的评价产生了积极影响。这种影响在男性以及18 - 49岁的年轻患者中尤为显著,他们感觉从全科医生那里得到了更多护理,且不再处于不确定状态。干预组中的年轻患者对全科医生疾病和治疗知识的评分显著高于对照组中的年轻患者。干预组与全科医生的接触次数显著更多。欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷和功能状态在两组之间无显著差异。

结论

一项全科医生和患者积极参与的跨部门共享护理计划对患者对医疗保健系统的态度有积极影响。年轻患者和男性尤其从该计划中受益。