Scholes C F, Gonty N, Trotman I F
Mount Vernon Hospital, Middlesex, UK.
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl). 1999 Mar;8(1):26-9. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2354.1999.00133.x.
To assess the use of methadone in patients with cancer pain who fail to respond to increasing doses of other opioids or experience intolerable side-effects from them.
Inpatients of a specialist palliative care unit were titrated onto oral methadone. The dose was calculated as 10% of the previous morphine equivalent dose, up to maximum of 40 mg, given every 3 h as required for analgesia. When daily requirements were stable it was divided into two regular doses. Pain was assessed on a five-point verbal rating score (VRS): a good response was defined as a fall in VRS of two points or more. Results are expressed as median (range).
Thirty-three patients (13 men, 20 women, age 61 (34-91) years), 26 with inadequate analgesia and seven with intolerable opioid related side-effects, were converted to methadone from diamorphine (12), morphine (19) or fentanyl (two). Morphine equivalent dose was 480 (20-1200) mg/day prior to titration. Pain was neuropathic (11), nociceptive (three) or mixed (19). Stabilisation on methadone was complete in 3 (2-18) days in 29 (88%) patients at 80 (20-360) mg/day. Twenty-six (78%) had a good response. Four (12%) patients were withdrawn during titration (three entered terminal phase, one failed to respond). During follow-up 15 (45%) required alteration of methadone dose. Twenty-three (70%) patients were discharged home at 12 (4-26) days. In all cases the stable dose of methadone was less than the previous morphine equivalent, and there was a weak correlation between them.
This method of methadone titration often results in improved pain control in patients with morphine resistance or intolerance. It requires careful titration in a specialist inpatient unit as there is no reliable formula for dose equivalence.
评估美沙酮在对其他阿片类药物剂量增加无反应或出现无法耐受的副作用的癌症疼痛患者中的应用。
对一家专科姑息治疗病房的住院患者进行口服美沙酮滴定。剂量按先前吗啡等效剂量的10%计算,最高40毫克,根据镇痛需要每3小时给药一次。当每日需求量稳定时,将其分为两个常规剂量。采用五点口头评分量表(VRS)评估疼痛:良好反应定义为VRS下降两点或更多。结果以中位数(范围)表示。
33例患者(13例男性,20例女性,年龄61(34 - 91)岁),26例镇痛效果不佳,7例有无法耐受的阿片类药物相关副作用,从二醋吗啡(12例)、吗啡(19例)或芬太尼(2例)转换为美沙酮。滴定前吗啡等效剂量为480(20 - 1200)毫克/天。疼痛类型为神经性(11例)、伤害性(3例)或混合性(19例)。29例(88%)患者在3(2 - 18)天内以80(20 - 360)毫克/天的剂量完成美沙酮滴定。26例(78%)有良好反应。4例(12%)患者在滴定过程中退出(3例进入终末期,1例无反应)。随访期间,15例(45%)患者需要调整美沙酮剂量。23例(70%)患者在12(4 - 26)天出院回家。在所有病例中,美沙酮的稳定剂量低于先前的吗啡等效剂量,且二者之间存在弱相关性。
这种美沙酮滴定方法通常能改善对吗啡耐药或不耐受患者的疼痛控制。由于没有可靠的等效剂量公式,需要在专科住院病房进行仔细滴定。