Kujumgiev A, Tsvetkova I, Serkedjieva Y, Bankova V, Christov R, Popov S
Institute of Microbiology, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Sofia.
J Ethnopharmacol. 1999 Mar;64(3):235-40. doi: 10.1016/s0378-8741(98)00131-7.
Propolis samples from different geographic origins were investigated for their antibacterial (against Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli), antifungal (against Candida albicans) and antiviral (against Avian influenza virus) activities. All samples were active against the fungal and Gram-positive bacterial test strains, and most showed antiviral activity. The activities of all samples were similar in spite of the differences in their chemical composition. In samples from the temperate zone, flavonoids and esters of phenolic acids are known to be responsible for the above mentioned activities of bee glue; tropical samples did not contain such substances but showed similar activities. Obviously, in different samples, different substance combinations are essential for the biological activity of the bee glue. It seems that propolis has general pharmacological value as a natural mixture and not as a source of new powerful antimicrobial, antifungal and antiviral compounds.
对来自不同地理来源的蜂胶样品进行了抗菌(针对金黄色葡萄球菌和大肠杆菌)、抗真菌(针对白色念珠菌)和抗病毒(针对禽流感病毒)活性研究。所有样品对真菌和革兰氏阳性细菌测试菌株均有活性,且大多数显示出抗病毒活性。尽管化学组成存在差异,但所有样品的活性相似。在温带地区的样品中,已知黄酮类化合物和酚酸酯是蜂胶上述活性的原因;热带地区的样品不含此类物质,但显示出相似的活性。显然,在不同的样品中,不同的物质组合对蜂胶的生物活性至关重要。蜂胶似乎作为一种天然混合物具有一般药理学价值,而不是作为新的强效抗菌、抗真菌和抗病毒化合物的来源。