Leino T K, Leppäluoto J, Ruokonen A, Kuronen P
Department of Physiology, University of Oulu, Finland.
Aviat Space Environ Med. 1999 Jun;70(6):565-70.
Information processing and stress tolerance are necessary features for instrument flying (IFR), especially among student pilots. Psychological workload of IFR flight may lead to stress reactions such as neuroendocrine activity.
Neuroendocrine responses to an IFR flight with Vinka piston-engined primary trainer were studied in 35 male volunteers who participated in the basic military flying course of the Finnish Air Force (FAF). The student pilots performed a 40-min IFR flight mission and a control session on land in randomized order between 11.00 h and 15.00 h. The IFR flight included 3 NDB approaches and was evaluated by flight instructors. Blood samples were collected 15 min before, 5 min and 60 min after the flight as well as control session, and. Plasma ACTH, beta3-endorphin (BE), cortisol, prolactin, adrenaline (A) and noradrenaline (NA) were measured. Psychological evaluations included psychomotor test (Wiener), Multi Coordination and Attention Test, ability tests and personality tests (CMPS and 16 PF). The overall psychological evaluation was made by an aviation psychologist.
Plasma ACTH was significantly higher before and 5 min after the flight compared with control levels, but plasma BE increased significantly only before the flight. Plasma cortisol was significantly elevated before and 5 min after the flight. Plasma prolactin, NA and A increases were significant 5 min after the flight. High A levels after the flight correlated significantly with poor IFR flight performance as well as with poor psychomotor test results.
The plasma prolactin and NA increases after the flight represented a direct type of stress reaction to the flight situation. The plasma BE response to IFR flight was an anticipatory stress reaction, but plasma ACTH, cortisol and A responses included both anticipatory and direct types of stress reactions. Psychological factors, flight performance and neuroendocrine responses to IFR flight appear to be associated with each other. Therefore, neuroendocrine reactions as a response to the psychological workload of military flying could be used for identifying stress tolerance in military pilots.
信息处理和应激耐受力是仪表飞行(IFR)所必需的特性,对于飞行学员而言尤为如此。仪表飞行的心理负荷可能会引发诸如神经内分泌活动等应激反应。
在35名参与芬兰空军(FAF)基础军事飞行课程的男性志愿者中,研究了使用温卡活塞发动机初级教练机进行仪表飞行时的神经内分泌反应。飞行学员在11:00至15:00之间随机顺序进行一次40分钟的仪表飞行任务和一次地面控制训练。仪表飞行包括3次无方向信标进近,并由飞行教员进行评估。在飞行前15分钟、飞行后5分钟和60分钟以及控制训练后采集血样。检测血浆促肾上腺皮质激素(ACTH)、β3-内啡肽(BE)、皮质醇、催乳素、肾上腺素(A)和去甲肾上腺素(NA)。心理评估包括心理运动测试(维纳测试)、多重协调和注意力测试、能力测试以及人格测试(CMPS和16PF)。整体心理评估由一名航空心理学家进行。
与控制水平相比,飞行前及飞行后5分钟时血浆ACTH显著升高,但血浆BE仅在飞行前显著增加。飞行前及飞行后5分钟时血浆皮质醇显著升高。飞行后5分钟时血浆催乳素、NA和A显著增加。飞行后高A水平与仪表飞行表现不佳以及心理运动测试结果不佳显著相关。
飞行后血浆催乳素和NA增加代表了对飞行情境的直接应激反应类型。血浆BE对仪表飞行的反应是一种预期性应激反应,但血浆ACTH、皮质醇和A反应包括预期性和直接性两种应激反应类型。心理因素、飞行表现以及对仪表飞行的神经内分泌反应似乎相互关联。因此,作为对军事飞行心理负荷的反应,神经内分泌反应可用于识别军事飞行员的应激耐受力。