Ridker P M
Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.
Ann Intern Med. 1999 Jun 1;130(11):933-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-130-11-199906010-00018.
Myocardial infarction often occurs among persons without traditional risk factors, and it has been hypothesized that assessment of "novel" markers may help identify persons who are prone to premature atherothrombosis. However, when considering the clinical utility of screening for any new marker for cardiovascular disease, physicians should consider whether there is a standardized and reproducible assay for the marker of interest; whether there is a consistent series of prospective epidemiologic studies indicating that baseline elevations of the novel marker predict future risk; and whether assessment of the novel marker adds to the predictive value of other plasma-based risk factors, specifically, the ratio of total cholesterol to high-density lipoprotein cholesterol. In this article, these criteria are used to evaluate five promising markers of cardiovascular risk: lipoprotein(a), total plasma homocysteine, fibrinolytic capacity, fibrinogen, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein. Background is also provided to assist physicians in deciding whether one or more of these novel markers deserve clinical consideration in general outpatient settings.
心肌梗死常发生在没有传统危险因素的人群中,据推测,评估“新型”标志物可能有助于识别易发生过早动脉粥样硬化血栓形成的人群。然而,在考虑筛查任何心血管疾病新标志物的临床实用性时,医生应考虑对于感兴趣的标志物是否有标准化且可重复的检测方法;是否有一系列一致的前瞻性流行病学研究表明新型标志物的基线升高可预测未来风险;以及评估新型标志物是否能增加其他基于血浆的危险因素(特别是总胆固醇与高密度脂蛋白胆固醇的比值)的预测价值。在本文中,这些标准用于评估五种有前景的心血管风险标志物:脂蛋白(a)、血浆总同型半胱氨酸、纤溶能力、纤维蛋白原和高敏C反应蛋白。同时还提供了背景信息,以帮助医生决定在普通门诊环境中这些新型标志物中的一种或多种是否值得临床考虑。