• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一种检测流感嗜血杆菌对复方新诺明敏感性的方法(作者译)

[A method for testing susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to co-trimoxazole (author's transl)].

作者信息

Machka K, Balg H, Smith M, Braveny I

出版信息

Immun Infekt. 1978 Dec;6(6):249-52.

PMID:103805
Abstract

Various methods for determining the activity of co-trimoxazole against haemophilus influenzae have been compared. The results were cortically influenced by antagonistic substances in the medium. The content of p-aminobenzoeacid and thymidine in the medium should be as low as possible. The antagonistic influences are compensated by lysed horseblood, which contains thymidine-phosphorylase. Haeminchloride and nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD) are better growth-factors than other poorly defined preparations (Supplement C, Fil-des-Enrichment, Iso-VitaleX). For the determination of the minimal inhibition concentration (MIC) we propose the microtiter technique. Likewise a modified agar diffusion test can be recommended for screening purposes. Of the 143 haemophilus influenzae strains tested against co-trimoxazole 134 (94%) were sensitive.

摘要

已比较了多种测定复方新诺明对流感嗜血杆菌活性的方法。结果在很大程度上受培养基中拮抗物质的影响。培养基中对氨基苯甲酸和胸腺嘧啶核苷的含量应尽可能低。溶血马血可补偿拮抗作用,因为其含有胸腺嘧啶磷酸化酶。氯化血红素和烟酰胺腺嘌呤二核苷酸(NAD)比其他定义不明确的制剂(补充剂C、富集培养物、异维生素X)是更好的生长因子。为测定最低抑菌浓度(MIC),我们推荐微量滴定技术。同样,改良的琼脂扩散试验也可用于筛选目的。在143株测试的流感嗜血杆菌中,134株(94%)对复方新诺明敏感。

相似文献

1
[A method for testing susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to co-trimoxazole (author's transl)].一种检测流感嗜血杆菌对复方新诺明敏感性的方法(作者译)
Immun Infekt. 1978 Dec;6(6):249-52.
2
In vitro sensitivity of hemophilus influenzae and streptococcus pyogenes to co-trimoxazole.流感嗜血杆菌和化脓性链球菌对复方新诺明的体外敏感性
Can Med Assoc J. 1975 Jun 14;112(13 Spec No):59-63.
3
In vitro resistance of haemophilus influenzae to co-trimoxazole and trimethoprim.流感嗜血杆菌对复方新诺明和甲氧苄啶的体外耐药性。
N Z Med J. 1975 Mar 26;81(536):292-4.
4
Influences of media and inocula on the in vitro susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to co-trimoxazole, ampicillin, penicillin, and chloramphenicol.培养基和接种物对流感嗜血杆菌体外对复方新诺明、氨苄西林、青霉素和氯霉素敏感性的影响。
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1975 Dec;8(6):657-63. doi: 10.1128/AAC.8.6.657.
5
Resistance to co-trimoxazole.对复方新诺明的耐药性。
Scand J Infect Dis Suppl. 1976(8):29-38.
6
[Comparative susceptibility testing to sulfamethoxazole and trimethoprim by agar diffusion test on different media (author's transl)].不同培养基上琼脂扩散法对磺胺甲恶唑和甲氧苄啶的药敏试验比较(作者译)
Immun Infekt. 1978 Dec;6(6):223-5.
7
[Resistance of Haemophilus influenzae to antibiotics in the Federal Republic of Germany (author's transl)].[德意志联邦共和国流感嗜血杆菌对抗生素的耐药性(作者译)]
Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 1980 Sep 26;105(39):1341-4. doi: 10.1055/s-2008-1070868.
8
In vitro susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole.流感嗜血杆菌对甲氧苄啶-磺胺甲恶唑的体外敏感性
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1974 Dec;6(6):869-70. doi: 10.1128/AAC.6.6.869.
9
[Influence of composition of the culture media on the in vitro determination of the bacterial sensitivity to sulfonamides, trimethoprim and cotrimoxazole].[培养基成分对体外测定细菌对磺胺类药物、甲氧苄啶和复方新诺明敏感性的影响]
Boll Ist Sieroter Milan. 1979 Jul 31;58(3):234-41.
10
[Study of susceptibility of Haemophilus influenzae to antibiotics (other than beta-lactams) by using HTM gelose (Haemophilus test medium)].[使用HTM琼脂糖(流感嗜血杆菌测试培养基)研究流感嗜血杆菌对(β-内酰胺类以外的)抗生素的敏感性]
Pathol Biol (Paris). 1993 Sep;41(7):596-603.

引用本文的文献

1
Cefadroxil versus penicillin in the treatment of streptococcal tonsillopharyngitis.
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 1989 Apr;8(4):282-8. doi: 10.1007/BF01963451.
2
[In vitro activity of cefaclor against Haemophilus influenzae in comparison to various oral chemotherapeutic agents (author's transl)].
Infection. 1979;7 Suppl 6:532-9. doi: 10.1007/BF01659728.