Suppr超能文献

无创通气:一家社区教学医院的经验

Noninvasive ventilation: experience at a community teaching hospital.

作者信息

Alsous F, Amoateng-Adjepong Y, Manthous C A

机构信息

Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Bridgeport Hospital, CT 06610, USA.

出版信息

Intensive Care Med. 1999 May;25(5):458-63. doi: 10.1007/s001340050880.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe our hospital's experience with noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (bilevel positive airway pressure; BiPAP) for patients with respiratory failure (RF).

DESIGN

Retrospective, observational study.

SETTING

A 300-bed community teaching hospital.

METHODS

Medical records were analyzed for physiologic and outcome variables for all patients who received BiPAP for RF between January 1994 and December 1996.

RESULTS

Eighty patients with a mean (+/- S.E.) age of 71.5+/-1.3 years and APACHE II score of 17.2+/-0.6 received BiPAP for RF during the study period. Thirty-one patients received BiPAP for hypoxemic RF, 25 for acute hypercapnic RF, 9 for chronic hypercapnic RF, 10 for postextubation RF and 5 could not be categorized. BiPAP success was defined as no need for invasive ventilation. BiPAP was successful in 47 of 75 cases that could be classified; all BiPAP successes lived whereas 18 of 28 BiPAP failures died. In the overall cohort, BiPAP success was associated with a lower ICU length of stay (5.8+/-0.9 versus 10.6+/-1.4 days, p < 0.01). The duration of BiPAP dependency in successful cases was 35.3+/-6.7 h. BiPAP was successful in 20 of 25 patients with acute hypercapnic RF and in 15 of 31 patients with hypoxemic RF. The risk of BiPAP failure was significantly greater (risk ratio = 2.6, 95% CI = 1.1-6.1) for patients with hypoxemic than for those with hypercapnic RF. BiPAP success was marked by increased PaO2/FIO2 in patients with hypoxemic RF and by increased pH and reduced PCO2 in patients with hypercapnic RF. BiPAP use was also successful in 8 of 10 patients who developed RF within 48 h of endotracheal extubation.

CONCLUSIONS

BiPAP is highly effective in selected patients with RF during routine use in a community teaching hospital. The success rate is higher amongst patients presenting with hypercapnic than amongst those with hypoxemic RF and BiPAP failure is associated with an increased likelihood of in-hospital mortality. BiPAP may also be used successfully to temporize patients who develop RF in the period following endotracheal extubation. The duration of BiPAP dependency (35 h in this study) was shorter than in previous trials, and, though this is speculative, may have been minimized by our performing a trial of unassisted breathing each day.

摘要

目的

描述我院对呼吸衰竭(RF)患者使用无创正压通气(双水平气道正压通气;BiPAP)的经验。

设计

回顾性观察研究。

地点

一家拥有300张床位的社区教学医院。

方法

分析1994年1月至1996年12月期间所有因RF接受BiPAP治疗的患者的生理和结局变量的病历。

结果

在研究期间,80例平均(±标准误)年龄为71.5±1.3岁、急性生理与慢性健康状况评分系统(APACHE II)评分为17.2±0.6的患者因RF接受了BiPAP治疗。31例患者因低氧性RF接受BiPAP治疗,25例因急性高碳酸血症性RF接受治疗,9例因慢性高碳酸血症性RF接受治疗,10例因拔管后RF接受治疗,5例无法分类。BiPAP成功定义为无需有创通气。在75例可分类的病例中,47例BiPAP治疗成功;所有BiPAP治疗成功的患者存活,而28例BiPAP治疗失败的患者中有18例死亡。在整个队列中,BiPAP治疗成功与重症监护病房(ICU)住院时间缩短相关(5.8±0.9天对10.6±1.4天,p<0.01)。成功病例中BiPAP依赖的持续时间为35.3±6.7小时。25例急性高碳酸血症性RF患者中有20例BiPAP治疗成功,31例低氧性RF患者中有15例治疗成功。低氧性RF患者BiPAP治疗失败的风险显著高于高碳酸血症性RF患者(风险比=2.6,95%置信区间=1.1-6.1)。低氧性RF患者BiPAP治疗成功的标志是动脉血氧分压/吸入氧分数值(PaO2/FIO2)升高,高碳酸血症性RF患者的标志是pH值升高和二氧化碳分压(PCO2)降低。在气管插管后48小时内发生RF的10例患者中,8例使用BiPAP治疗也成功。

结论

在社区教学医院的常规使用中,BiPAP对部分RF患者非常有效。高碳酸血症性RF患者的成功率高于低氧性RF患者,BiPAP治疗失败与院内死亡可能性增加相关。BiPAP也可成功用于气管插管后发生RF的患者的临时治疗。BiPAP依赖持续时间(本研究中为35小时)短于先前试验,尽管这只是推测,但可能通过我们每天进行自主呼吸试验而降至最低。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验