Green A, Pollitt R J
Clinical Chemistry Department, Birmingham Children's Hospital, UK.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 1999 Jun;22(4):572-9. doi: 10.1023/a:1005572710844.
Some of the generally accepted criteria for screening programmes are inappropriate for newborn metabolic screening as they ignore the family dimension and the importance of timely genetic information. Uncritical application of such criteria creates special difficulties for screening by tandem mass spectrometry, which can detect a range diseases with widely different natural histories and responsiveness to treatment. Further difficulties arise from increasing demands for direct proof of the effects of screening on long-term morbidity and mortality. The randomized controlled trial is held to be the gold standard, but for ethical and practical reasons it will be impossible to achieve for such relatively rare diseases. This approach also oversimplifies the complex matrix of costs and benefits of newborn metabolic screening. A more workable approach could involve Bayesian synthesis, combining quantitative performance data from carefully designed prospective pilot studies of screening with existing experience of the natural history, diagnosis, and management of the individual disorders concerned.
一些普遍认可的筛查项目标准并不适用于新生儿代谢筛查,因为它们忽视了家庭因素以及及时获取基因信息的重要性。不加批判地应用这些标准给串联质谱筛查带来了特殊困难,串联质谱能够检测出一系列自然病史和对治疗反应差异很大的疾病。由于对筛查对长期发病率和死亡率影响的直接证据的需求不断增加,进一步的困难也随之出现。随机对照试验被视为金标准,但出于伦理和实际原因,对于这类相对罕见的疾病来说是无法实现的。这种方法也过于简化了新生儿代谢筛查成本和效益的复杂矩阵。一种更可行的方法可能涉及贝叶斯综合分析,将精心设计的筛查前瞻性试点研究的定量性能数据与有关个体疾病自然病史、诊断和管理的现有经验相结合。