Pollitt R J
Children's Hospital, Western Bank, Sheffield, S10 2TH, UK.
J Inherit Metab Dis. 2006 Apr-Jun;29(2-3):390-6. doi: 10.1007/s10545-006-0259-2.
The development of electrospray tandem mass spectrometry (MS-MS) has greatly increased the number of diseases that can be detected by newborn blood-spot screening. Different countries are introducing the technology at different rates and for different disease panels. Current policies in the United Kingdom, Germany and the United States are taken as examples. In the United Kingdom, many laboratories are using MS-MS for routine screening for phenylketonuria but, except for those participating in a two-year pilot study of screening for medium-chain acyl-CoA dehydrogenase deficiency, are forbidden use MS-MS to screen for other disorders. In Germany there has been considerable experience of MS-MS screening for a wide range of diseases, but recently the Federal Ministry for Health and Social Security prescribed a much more restricted disease panel, with the instruction that any other diagnostic results are to be suppressed and not reported. By contrast, a recent report from the American College of Medical Genetics, still being debated, recommends screening procedures that will detect an extremely broad range of disorders, including some that are very rare or of unproven clinical significance. The lack of even broad concordance at the level of national policy is extremely disturbing. Though all discussion is nominally founded on the ten principles laid down by Wilson and Jungner in 1968, there seems no generally accepted way of using these principles, or derived criteria, as objective decision tools. Alternative, less categorical, approaches are needed: the disorders concerned are not homogeneous entities and there may be advantages to screening other than reducing morbidity or mortality.
电喷雾串联质谱(MS-MS)技术的发展极大地增加了可通过新生儿血斑筛查检测出的疾病数量。不同国家引入该技术的速度不同,用于筛查的疾病组合也不同。本文以英国、德国和美国的现行政策为例进行说明。在英国,许多实验室使用MS-MS对苯丙酮尿症进行常规筛查,但除了那些参与中链酰基辅酶A脱氢酶缺乏症两年筛查试点研究的实验室外,禁止使用MS-MS筛查其他疾病。在德国,MS-MS已广泛应用于多种疾病的筛查,但最近联邦卫生与社会保障部规定了范围更为受限的疾病组合,并指示任何其他诊断结果均应隐匿不报。相比之下,美国医学遗传学学会最近的一份报告(该报告仍在讨论中)建议采用能够检测出范围极其广泛的疾病的筛查程序,包括一些非常罕见或临床意义尚未得到证实的疾病。在国家政策层面甚至缺乏广泛的一致性,这令人极为不安。尽管所有讨论名义上都是基于威尔逊和荣格纳在1968年提出的十条原则,但似乎没有普遍认可的方法将这些原则或衍生标准用作客观的决策工具。需要采用其他不那么绝对的方法:所涉及的疾病并非同类实体,并且筛查可能除了降低发病率或死亡率之外还有其他益处。