Carney S L, Gillies A H, Green S L, Paterson O, Taylor M S, Smith A J
Division of Medicine, John Hunter Hospital, Newcastle, NSW, Australia.
J Qual Clin Pract. 1999 Jun;19(2):95-8. doi: 10.1046/j.1440-1762.1999.00308.x.
Evaluation of the ability of clinical staff to measure blood pressure as well as the functional state of hospital sphygmomanometers has consistently demonstrated marked deficiencies. In this study, the working order of all sphygmomanometers (manual and automated) in a teaching hospital was evaluated. Nursing staff were tested on their knowledge and use of such devices and were also asked to estimate the blood pressure from videotape. The accuracy of a commonly used automated device, Dinamap 8100, was also measured. Of 543 manual sphygmomanometers, 14% were in perfect working order although portable devices were more likely to be functional (47% of 36 units). In contrast, all 135 automated portable devices were in perfect working order although service requirements were seldom met. The mean time since last service was 18 months. There appeared to be an inverse correlation between the availability of automated and manual devices and the maintenance of wall-mounted bedside sphygmomanometers. Staff knowledge about manual devices was adequate as was their ability to accurately measure blood pressure using standardised videotape. Forty-two per cent of 31 nurses who completed the test were correct in 9 of 12 blood pressures. A comparison of this result with a comparable group of nurses tested in 1990 did not detect a significant change in competence. Direct evaluation of the commonly used Dinamap 8100 in 47 hospital patients demonstrated a poor correlation with a mercury sphygmomanometer with a D grade (fail) for systolic and a C grade for diastolic pressure. In summary, maintenance of manual sphygmomanometers was very poor, probably due to their lack of use by clinical staff. This was particularly true for units attached to bedside walls. Nursing staff demonstrated significant deficiencies in manual sphygmomanometer use although their skills were similar to those measured several years earlier. Because of the demonstrated inaccuracy of the Dinamap 8100 automated device, the strong trend towards the use of automated devices instead of manual sphygmomanometers within hospitals cannot be supported.
对临床工作人员测量血压的能力以及医院血压计的功能状态进行评估的结果一直显示出明显的不足。在本研究中,对一家教学医院所有血压计(手动和自动)的工作状况进行了评估。对护理人员关于此类设备的知识和使用情况进行了测试,并要求他们根据录像带估计血压。还测量了一种常用自动设备Dinamap 8100的准确性。在543台手动血压计中,14%处于完美工作状态,不过便携式设备更有可能正常工作(36台中有47%)。相比之下,所有135台自动便携式设备都处于完美工作状态,尽管很少满足维修要求。自上次维修以来的平均时间为18个月。自动和手动设备的可用性与壁挂式床边血压计的维护之间似乎存在负相关。工作人员关于手动设备的知识充足,他们使用标准化录像带准确测量血压的能力也足够。在完成测试的31名护士中,42%在12次血压测量中有9次正确。将这一结果与1990年测试的一组类似护士进行比较,未发现能力有显著变化。对47名住院患者常用的Dinamap 8100进行直接评估,结果显示与汞柱式血压计的相关性较差,收缩压为D级(不合格),舒张压为C级。总之,手动血压计的维护情况非常差,可能是因为临床工作人员使用较少。床边壁挂式设备尤其如此。护理人员在使用手动血压计方面表现出明显不足,尽管他们的技能与几年前测量的相似。由于已证明Dinamap 8100自动设备不准确,因此医院内使用自动设备而非手动血压计的强烈趋势无法得到支持。