• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用基于选择的联合分析来确定牙科福利计划属性的相对重要性。

Using choice-based conjoint to determine the relative importance of dental benefit plan attributes.

作者信息

Cunningham M A, Gaeth G J, Juang C, Chakraborty G

机构信息

Department of Preventive and Community Dentistry, University of Iowa, USA.

出版信息

J Dent Educ. 1999 May;63(5):391-9.

PMID:10410159
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to use conjoint analysis to determine the importance of specific dental benefit plan features for University of Iowa (UI) staff and to build a model to predict enrollment. From a random sample of 2000 UI staff, 40 percent responded (N = 773). The survey instrument was developed using seven attributes (five dental benefit plan features and two facility characteristics) each offered at three levels (e.g., premium = $20, $15, $10/month). Pilot testing was used to find a realistic range of plan options. Twenty-seven hypothetical dental benefit plans were developed using fractional factorial combinations of the three levels for each of the seven attributes. For all of the hypothetical plans, dental care was to be provided in the UI predoctoral dental clinic. Plan profiles were arranged four per page by combining the existing plan with three hypothetical plans, for a total of nine pages. Respondents' task was to select one plan from each set of four. A regression-like statistical model (Multinomial Logit) was used to estimate importance of each attribute and each attribute level. Relative importance (and coefficients) for each of the seven attributes are as follows: maximum annual benefit (.98), orthodontic coverage (.72), routine restorative (.70), major restorative (.67), time to complete treatment (.61), clinic hours of operation (.47), premium (.18). For each attribute, relative importance of each of three levels will also be presented. These coefficients for each level are used to predict enrollment for plans with specific combinations of the dental benefit plan features.

摘要

本研究的目的是运用联合分析来确定爱荷华大学(UI)员工对特定牙科福利计划特征的重视程度,并构建一个预测参保情况的模型。从2000名UI员工的随机样本中,40%的人做出了回应(N = 773)。调查工具是利用七个属性(五个牙科福利计划特征和两个机构特征)开发的,每个属性都有三个水平(例如,保费 = 每月20美元、15美元、10美元)。通过先导测试来确定一系列实际可行的计划选项。利用七个属性中每个属性的三个水平的分数因子组合,开发了27种假设的牙科福利计划。对于所有假设计划,牙科护理将在UI博士前牙科诊所提供。通过将现有计划与三个假设计划相结合,每页安排四个计划简介,共九页。受访者的任务是从每组四个计划中选择一个。使用类似回归的统计模型(多项逻辑回归)来估计每个属性及其每个水平的重要性。七个属性各自的相对重要性(及系数)如下:年度最高福利(0.98)、正畸保险范围(0.72)、常规修复(0.70)、重大修复(0.67)、完成治疗时间(0.61)、诊所营业时间(0.47)、保费(0.18)。对于每个属性,还将呈现三个水平各自的相对重要性。这些每个水平的系数用于预测具有特定牙科福利计划特征组合的计划的参保情况。

相似文献

1
Using choice-based conjoint to determine the relative importance of dental benefit plan attributes.使用基于选择的联合分析来确定牙科福利计划属性的相对重要性。
J Dent Educ. 1999 May;63(5):391-9.
2
Will choice-based reform work for Medicare? Evidence from the Federal Employees Health Benefits Program.基于选择的改革对医疗保险是否有效?来自联邦雇员健康福利计划的证据。
Health Serv Res. 2006 Oct;41(5):1741-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00580.x.
3
Employer health insurance offerings and employee enrollment decisions.雇主提供的健康保险及员工的参保决策。
Health Serv Res. 2005 Oct;40(5 Pt 1):1259-78. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2005.00415.x.
4
The effect of premiums on the decision to participate in health insurance and other fringe benefits offered by the employer: evidence from a real-world experiment.保费对参与雇主提供的健康保险及其他附加福利决策的影响:来自一项实际实验的证据。
J Health Econ. 2005 Jan;24(1):95-112. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2004.07.005.
5
Dental plans for the new millennium.新千年的牙科计划。
J Can Dent Assoc. 2000 Apr;66(4):188-90.
6
Premiums, benefits, and employee choice of health insurance options.医疗保险选项的保费、福利及员工选择
J Health Econ. 1989 Dec;8(3):293-311. doi: 10.1016/0167-6296(89)90023-4.
7
Early experience with employee choice of consumer-directed health plans and satisfaction with enrollment.员工选择消费者导向型健康计划的早期体验及对参保的满意度。
Health Serv Res. 2004 Aug;39(4 Pt 2):1141-58. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2004.00279.x.
8
Pilot study of a hierarchical Bayes method for utility estimation in a choice-based conjoint analysis of prescription benefit plans including medication therapy management services.在包括药物治疗管理服务的处方福利计划的基于选择的联合分析中,用于效用估计的分层贝叶斯方法的试点研究。
Res Social Adm Pharm. 2008 Sep;4(3):218-30. doi: 10.1016/j.sapharm.2007.08.002.
9
Plan choice, health insurance cost and premium sharing.计划选择、医疗保险费用及保费分摊
J Health Econ. 2014 May;35:179-88. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2014.03.002. Epub 2014 Mar 15.
10
Characteristics of employers offering dental coverage in the United States.美国提供牙科保险的雇主特征。
J Am Dent Assoc. 2010 Jun;141(6):700-11. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2010.0261.

引用本文的文献

1
Knowledge and attitudes of dental students and interns on minimally invasive dentistry for pediatric dentistry at King Saud University.沙特国王大学牙科专业学生和实习生对儿童牙科微创牙科的知识与态度
BMC Oral Health. 2025 May 14;25(1):721. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06087-y.
2
Understanding decision making for the use of atraumatic restorative approach based on non-clinical factors by Indian pedodontists - a conjoint analysis.基于非临床因素的印度儿童牙医采用非创伤性修复治疗方法的决策分析——联合分析
F1000Res. 2024 Nov 21;13:1401. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.157561.1. eCollection 2024.
3
Understanding Pediatric Dentists' Dental Caries Management Treatment Decisions: A Conjoint Experiment.
理解儿童牙医的龋齿管理治疗决策:一项联合实验。
JDR Clin Trans Res. 2016 Apr;1(1):86-94. doi: 10.1177/2380084416636589. Epub 2016 Feb 29.
4
Critical review of willingness to pay for clinical oral health interventions.临床口腔健康干预措施支付意愿的批判性评价。
J Dent. 2017 Sep;64:1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2017.06.010. Epub 2017 Jun 27.
5
The willingness of US pediatric dentists to use atraumatic restorative treatment (ART) with their patients: a conjoint analysis.美国儿科牙医愿意对其患者采用非创伤性修复治疗(ART):一项联合分析。
J Public Health Dent. 2014 Summer;74(3):234-40. doi: 10.1111/jphd.12052. Epub 2014 Mar 17.