Guh J Y, Yang C Y, Yang J M, Chen L M, Lai Y H
Department of Internal Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical College, Taiwan, ROC.
Am J Kidney Dis. 1998 Apr;31(4):638-46. doi: 10.1053/ajkd.1998.v31.pm9531180.
In urea kinetic modeling, postdialysis blood urea nitrogen (BUN) is usually underestimated with an overestimation of the Kt/V especially in high-efficiency hemodialysis (HD). Thus, an artificial neural network (ANN) was used to predict the equilibrated BUN (Ceq) and equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V60) by using both predialysis, postdialysis, and low-flow postdialysis BUN. The results were compared to a Smye formula to predict Ceq and a Daugirdas' formula (eKt/V30) to predict eKt/V60. Seventy-four patients on high-efficiency or high-flux HD were recruited. Their mean urea rebound was 28.6+/-2%. Patients were divided into a "training" set (n = 40) and a validation set (n = 34) for the ANN. Their status was exchanged later, and the two results were pooled. In the prediction of Ceq, both Smye formula and low-flow ANN were equally highly accurate. In patients with a high urea rebound (>30%), although Smye formula lost its accuracy, low-flow ANN remained accurate. In the prediction of eKt/V60, both Daugirdas' formula and low-flow ANN were equally accurate, although the Smye formula was not so accurate. In patients with a high urea rebound, although both Smye and Daugirdas' formulas lost their accuracy, low-flow ANN remained accurate. We concluded that low-flow ANN can accurately predict both Ceq and eKt/V60 regardless of the degree of urea rebound.
在尿素动力学建模中,尤其是在高效血液透析(HD)中,透析后血尿素氮(BUN)通常被低估,而Kt/V被高估。因此,使用人工神经网络(ANN)通过透析前、透析后和低流量透析后BUN来预测平衡BUN(Ceq)和平衡Kt/V(eKt/V60)。将结果与预测Ceq的Smye公式和预测eKt/V60的Daugirdas公式(eKt/V30)进行比较。招募了74例接受高效或高通量HD的患者。他们的平均尿素反弹率为28.6±2%。将患者分为ANN的“训练”组(n = 40)和验证组(n = 34)。之后交换他们的分组情况,并将两个结果合并。在预测Ceq时,Smye公式和低流量ANN的准确性同样高。在尿素反弹率高(>30%)的患者中,尽管Smye公式失去了准确性,但低流量ANN仍然准确。在预测eKt/V60时,Daugirdas公式和低流量ANN同样准确,尽管Smye公式不太准确。在尿素反弹率高的患者中,尽管Smye公式和Daugirdas公式都失去了准确性,但低流量ANN仍然准确。我们得出结论,无论尿素反弹程度如何,低流量ANN都能准确预测Ceq和eKt/V60。